The Effect of The Use Morphine, in Two Different Formulations, on The Postoperative Analgesia in Premedication: [Premedikasyonda İki Ayrı Formda Morfin  Kullanımının Postoperatif Ağrıya Etkisi]

Nursan TAHTACI; Ünsal ÖNER; Sevgi BAKARİŞ

doi:10.58600/eurjther.19920302-1130

Authors

Nursan TAHTACI Gaziantep Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon ABD.Yrd.Doç.Dr
Ünsal ÖNER Gaziantep Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon ABD.Doç.Dr.
Sevgi BAKARİŞ Gaziantep Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon ABD.Arşt.Gör.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther.19920302-1130

Keywords:

MST, Premedication, postoperative Analgesia

Abstract

The use of two different formulations of morphine for the purpose of premedication were investigated for postoperative analgesia. It was studied on 40 patients. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups patients in Group 1 received morphine sulphate orally (MST Continus tablets) 30 mg and patients in Group 11 received I.M. morphine (Chl) 10 mg. The effectiveness for premedication and subsequent postoperative analgesia, of two different formulations of morphine administration was investigated. The demand for postoperative analgesia was assessed subjectively employing a Linear 10 cm analogue scal. It was abserved that, oral morphine provided better postoperative analgesia. Which was of Longer duration, but when it was evaluated statiscally, it was found meaningless. The side effects depending on morphine were investigated. It was observed that the rate of nausea and vomiting with MST was less than with I.M. morphine. Pulse rate and mean arterial pressure values were compared with control values and no statistically difference was found finally. It was observed that; MST provided Longer postoperative analgesia and caused nausea and vomiting in a Lesser degree.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Jaffee JH:Narcotic analysis in the pharamacological of therepautics 5 th edition, eds. Goodman LSaGilman A, 1975 London, New York Macmillon.pp:237-275.

Atkinson RS, Rushman GB:1982 Synopsis of Anaesthesia, 9 th edn.Wright Bristol.

Dundee JW, Loan WB, Morrison JD:Studies of drugs given before anaesthesia.XIX.The opiates. Br.J.Anaesth, 42:54, 1970.

Fell D, Chmielewski A, Smith G:Postoperative analgesi With controlled release morphine sulphate:Comparison With intramuskular morphine.Br.Med.J.285:92-94, 1982.

Hanks GW, Rose NM, Ahern GW, t all:Controlled-release morphine tablets-A double-blind trial in dental patients, Br.J.Anaesth, 53:1259, 1981.

Gordon NH, Fillobas PA, Moss JG:Prmedication with, controled-release morphine tablets: A double- blind comparisan with dummy tablets to assess the duration of analgesia. In:Wilykes E, Levy J.eds.ibid:51-54.

Hadaway E.G:(1984) Premedication of children using morphineSulphate continus tablets.Royal Society of medicine International congress and symposium series N0:64.

Assaf RAE, Finnegan B, Hughes A:A comparison of sustained-release morphine (MST contunus tablets 30 mg) with intramuscular morphine 10 mg in patients undergoing tonsillec tomy. in : Wilke E, Levy J, eds.İbid:57-61, 1984.

Leslie ST, Rhodes A, Black FM:Controlled-release morphine sulphate tablets-A study in normal vounteers, Br.J.Oin, Pharmacol, 9:531-534, 1980.

Slowey HF, Reynolds AD, Mapleson WW, et all:Effect of premedication With controlled-release oral morphine on postoperative pain. A comparison with intramuskular morphine, Anaesthesia, 40:438-40, 1985.

Park GR, Weir D:A comparison of effect of oral controlled release morphine and intramuskuler morphine on gastric emptying, Anaesthesia, 39:645-8, 1984.

Lew JKL, Mobley KA,Achola KJ, et all:Postoperative absorption of controlled-release morphine sulphate. A study in patients given no paranteral opioids.Anaesthesia.44:101-103, 1989.

Pinnock CA, Derbyshire DR, Elling AE, et all:Comparison of oral slow release morphine (MSl) With intramuscular morphine for premedication, Anaesthesia, 40:1082-5, 1985.