Evaluating the attitudes of general dental practitioners in Gaziantep about endodontics

Gaziantep ilindeki diş hekimlerinin endodonti pratiği ile ilgili alışkanlıklarının değerlendirilmesi


Abstract views: 150 / PDF downloads: 67

Authors

  • Erhan Demir Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey
  • Emre Culha Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey
  • Cihan Yıldırım Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey
  • Uğur Aydın Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5455/GMJ-30-178278

Keywords:

Adoption, general dental practitioner, endodontics

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the level of knowledge of dentists working in Gaziantep about the stages of root canal treatment. Questionnaires were reached to 118 general dental practitioners working in Gaziantep. Questionnaire was including questions such as age, gender, year of graduation, root canal medicament, root canal sealer, irrigation solution, use of rotary instrument and apex locator, number of sessions, indication of retreatment. Results were analyzed with chi-square test. A hundred of the dentists accepted to be included in the survey. The most frequently preferential inter-appointment medicament was calcium hydroxide with a ratio of 84 % (p < 0,05). Resin based sealers are the mostly used sealers (p < 0,05) while endomethazone and zinc oxide eugenol based sealers (ZOE) are used less frequently. Composite is preferred by 71% of respondents for coronal restoration (p < 0,05) while amalgam is the second most used material with the ratio of 41 %. Single visit treatment is carried out especially by 15-20 and 0-5 years graduate to single-double rooted teeth. For working length determination, 64% of respondents prefer radiographic method, 32 % of them use apex locators while 42% rely upon tactile sensation. Among the respondents, 41% use only hand files for preparation while % 59 use rotary instruments. Sodium hypochlorite is the most used irrigant while chlorhexidine is used less. General dental practitioners in Gaziantep should obviate the information deficiencies about different steps of endodontics.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Friedman S. Considerations and concepts of case selection in the management of post treatment endodontic disease (treatment failure). Endodontic Topics 2002;1:54-78.

Orbak R, Ertunç D. Erzurum ve çevresindeki diş hekimlerinin implantolojiye yaklaşımları. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 1999;9:1-4.

Ingle J, Bakland L. Endodontics: 1994. Lea & Febiger, Baltimore.

Loest C. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006;39:921-30.

Iqbal A, Akbar I, Qureshi B, Sghaireen MG, Al-Omiri MK. A Survey of Standard Protocols for Endodontic Treatment in North of KSA. ISRN Dent 2014;2014:865780:1-4.

Gupta R, Rai R. The adoption of new endodontic technology by Indian dental practitioners: a questionnaire survey. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:2610-4.

Bjorndal L, Reit C. The adoption of new endodontic technology amongst Danish general dental practitioners. Int Endod J 2005;38:52-8.

Unal GC, Kaya BU, Tac AG, Kececi AD. Survey of attitudes, materials and methods preferred in root canal therapy by general dental practice in Turkey: Part 1. Eur J Dent 2012;6:376-84.

Wenteler GL, Sathorn C, Parashos P. Factors influencing root canal retreatment strategies by general practitioners and specialists in Australia. Int Endod J 5.7.2014/ online yayınlanmıştır .

Slaus G, Bottenberg P. A survey of endodontic practice amongst Flemish dentists. Int Endod J 2002;35:759-67.

Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990;16:498-504.

Weiger R, Axmann-Krcmar D, Lost C. Prognosis of conventional root canal treatment reconsidered. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998;14:1-9.

Eriksen HM. Endodontology--epidemiologic considerations. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991;7:189-95.

Özperk G. Ankara ilinin üç semtinde, son bir yıl İiçinde dişhekimine başvuran hastaların verilen hizmetten memnuniyetleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 1997;7:70-6.

Kaptan RF, Haznedaroglu F, Kayahan MB, Basturk FB. An investigation of current endodontic practice in Turkey. ScientificWorldJournal 2012;2012:565413:1-6.

Al-Hadlaq SM, Almadi KH, Alaqla AT, Al-Maflehi NS, Albaker A. Adoption of new endodontic technology by dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia. King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences 2011;2:7-11.

Dummer PM, McGinn JH, Rees DG. The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen. Int Endod J 1984;17:192-8.

Stober EK, de Ribot J, Mercade M, et al. Evaluation of the Raypex 5 and the Mini Apex Locator: an in vivo study. J Endod 2011;37:1349-52.

ElAyouti A, Weiger R, Lost C. Frequency of overinstrumentation with an acceptable radiographic working length. J Endod 2001;27:49-52.

Tamse A, Kaffe I, Fishel D. Zygomatic arch interference with correct radiographic diagnosis in maxillary molar endodontics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980;50:563-6.

Goldberg F, De Silvio AC, Manfre S, Nastri N. In vitro measurement accuracy of an electronic apex locator in teeth with simulated apical root resorption. J Endod 2002;28:461- 3.

Schafer E, Lau R. Comparison of cutting efficiency and instrumentation of curved canals with nickel-titanium and stainless-steel instruments. J Endod 1999;25:427-30.

Vaudt J, Bitter K, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments. Int Endod J 2009;42:22-33.

Di Fiore PM, Genov KA, Komaroff E, Li Y, Lin L. Nickeltitanium rotary instrument fracture: a clinical practice assessment. Int Endod J 2006;39:700-8.

Hartmann MS, Barletta FB, Camargo Fontanella VR, Vanni JR. Canal transportation after root canal instrumentation: a comparative study with computed tomography. J Endod 2007;33:962-5.

Parashos P, Messer H. Questionnaire survey on the use of rotary nickel–titanium endodontic instruments by Australian dentists. Int Endod J 2004;37:249-59.

Siqueira J, Machado A, Silveira R, Lopes H, Uzeda Md. Evaluation of the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three irrigation methods in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal, in vitro. Int Endod J 1997;30:279-82.

Saunders WP, Chestnutt IG, Saunders EM. Factors influencing the diagnosis and management of teeth with pulpal and periradicular disease by general dental practitioners. Part 1. Br Dent J 1999;187:492-7.

Heling I, Chandler NP. Antimicrobial effect of irrigant combinations within dentinal tubules. Int Endod J 1998;31:8-14.

Nakamura VC, Cai S, Candeiro GTdM, Ferrari P, Caldeira CL, Gavini G. Ex vivo evaluation of the effects of several root canal preparation techniques and irrigation regimens on a mixed microbial infection. Int Endod J 2013;46:217-24.

Hulsmann M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J 2003;36:810-30.

Mozayeni MA, Javaheri GH, Poorroosta P, Ashari MA, Javaheri HH. Effect of 17% EDTA and MTAD on intracanal smear layer removal: a scanning electron microscopic study. Aust Endod J 2009;35:13-7.

Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics. Int Endod J 2009;42:288- 302.

Hulsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during root canal irrigation--literature review and case reports. Int Endod J 2000;33:186-93.

Lewis B. Formaldehyde in dentistry: a review for the millennium. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998;22:167-77.

Hauman CH, Love RM. Biocompatibility of dental materials used in contemporary endodontic therapy: a review. Part 1. Intracanal drugs and substances. Int Endod J 2003;36:75-85.

Orstavik D, Nordahl I, Tibballs JE. Dimensional change following setting of root canal sealer materials. Dent Mater 2001;17:512-19.

Antrim DD. Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of root canal sealing agents on tissue culture cells in vitro: Grossman's sealer, N2 (permanent), Rickerts's sealer, and Cavit. J Endod 1976;2:111-6.

Su Y, Wang C, Ye L. Healing rate and post-obturation pain of single- versus multiple-visit endodontic treatment for infected root canals: a systematic review. J Endod 2011;37:125-32.

Shahrbaf S, Mirzakouchaki B, Oskoui SS, Kahnamoui MA. The effect of marginal ridge thickness on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated, composite restored maxillary premolars. Oper Dent 2007;32:285-90.

Steele A, Johnson BR. In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars. J Endod 1999;25:6-8.

Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, Davidson CL. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored. Am J Dent 1997;10:237-41.

Trope M, Langer I, Maltz D, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated premolars. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2:35-8.

Palmer NO, Ahmed M, Grieveson B. An investigation of current endodontic practice and training needs in primary care in the north west of England. Br Dent J 2009;206:E22; discussion 584-5.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-05

How to Cite

Demir, E., Culha, E., Yıldırım, C., & Aydın, U. (2023). Evaluating the attitudes of general dental practitioners in Gaziantep about endodontics: Gaziantep ilindeki diş hekimlerinin endodonti pratiği ile ilgili alışkanlıklarının değerlendirilmesi. European Journal of Therapeutics, 21(3), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.5455/GMJ-30-178278

Issue

Section

Original Articles