Which is Best for Predicting Uveitis in Behc¸et’s Syndrome: Systemic Immune Inflammatory Index, Mean Platelet Volume, Platelet/Lymphocyte Ratio, or Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio?
Abstract views: 299 / PDF downloads: 269
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjther.2021.20129Keywords:
Behc¸et’s syndrome, uveitis, systemic immune inflammatory index, mean platelet volume, platelet /lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratioAbstract
Objective: Behc¸et’s Syndrome (BS) is a multisystemic disease characterized by oral and genital ulcers, which can cause vasculitis that can affect all size of the vessels. We aimed to investigate the power of predicting uveitis of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/ lymphocyte ratio (PLR), mean platelet volume (MPV) and a new parameter, the systemic inflammatory immune index (SII). Methods: Two hundred four patients with BS were enrolled at Kayseri City Education and Research Hospital, whose follow-up continued from July 2018-September 2020. Thirty-three patients were excluded because of history of cancer, colchicine use, arthritis at the time of diagnosis and complete blood count parameters being excessively higher or lower than the limit values. Of the remaining 171 patients, 35 uveitis patients’ NLR, PLR, MPV and SII at the time of uveitis were compared with the results of patients without uveitis. Results: The sensitivity of NLR in predicting uveitis was calculated as 74.3% and specificity was 64.7%. The sensitivity and specificity of SII, in predicting uveitis, were 62.9% and 65.4%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for NLR was 0.684 and (P = 0.001). In addition, the area under the curve for SII was 0.662 (P = 0.003). Again for PLR and MPV, the area under the ROC curve was found as 0.566 and 0.428, respectively (P = 0.188 and 0.230, respectively). Conclusion: There is no specific test that can precisely predict BS and its complications. . These findings suggest that NLR is a better marker than SII, MPV and PLR in predicting anterior uveitis in patients with BS.
Metrics
References
Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, et al. Urinary Tract Infections: Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 5th ed. Philadelphia, New York: Lippincott Comp, 1996: 136.
Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Uzmanları Ic¸in Klinik O¨ rnekten Sonuc¸ Raporuna Uygulama Rehberi, U¨ riner Sistem O¨ rnekleri. Ankara: KL_IMUD
Yayınları C ag˘han Ofset Matbaacılık, 2015.
O¨ zc¸akar ZB, Yalc¸ınkaya F. _Idrar yolu enfeksiyonları. Tu¨rkiye Klinikleri Pediatri Dergisi. 2007;3:99-104.
Monsen T, Ryden P. Flowcytometry analysis using Sysmex UF-1000i classifies uropathogens based on bacterial, leukocyte, and erythrocyte counts in urine specimens among patients with urinary tract infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(2):539-545.
Okada H, Sakai Y, Kawabata G, et al. Automated urine analysisevaluation of the Sysmex UF-50. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;115(4):605-
Jolkkonen S, Paattiniemi EL, Karpanoja P, et al. Screening of urine samples by flow cytometry reduces the need for culture. J Clin
Microbiol. 2010;48(9):3117-3121.
Wang J, Zhang Y, Xu D, et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Am J Clin Pathol.
;133(4):577-582.
De Rosa R, Grosso S, Lorenzi G, et al. Evaluation of the new Sysmex UF-5000 fluorescence flow cytometry analyser for ruling out bacterial urinary tract infection and for prediction of gram negative bacteria in urine cultures. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;484:171-178.
Previtali G, Ravasio R, Seghezzi M, et al. Performance evaluation of the new fully automated urine particle analyser UF-5000 compared to the reference method of the Fuchs-Rosenthalchamber. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;472:123-130.
Bilgehan H. Klinik Mikrobiyolojik Tanı, 3. Baskı, _Izmir: Barıs Yayınları Faku¨ lteler Kitabevi, 2002.
Davenport M, Mach KE, Shortliffe LMD, et al. New and developing diagnostic technologies for urinary tract infections. Nat Rev Urol.
;14(5):296-310.
Ay C, Cantu¨ rk Z. Flowsitometrinin mikrobiyoloji alanında kullanımı. Erciyes U¨niversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitu¨su¨ Fen Bilimleri Dergisi.
;31(3):144-151.
U¨ zmez E, Yag˘cı S, Yu¨ cel M, et al. _Idrarda Lo¨kosit/Bakteri Analizi Yapan Akım Sitometri Cihazı Sonuc¸ları ile _Idrar Ku¨ltu¨ru¨ Sonuc¸larının Kars ılas tırılması Tu¨rk Mikrobiyol Cem Derg. 2018;48(1):78-85.
Ren C, Wu J, Jin M, et al. Rapidly discriminating culturenegative turine specimens from patients with suspected urinary
tract infections by UF-5000. Bioanalysis. 2018;10(22):1833-1840.
Ippoliti R, Allievi I, Rocchetti A. UF-5000 flow cytometer: A new technology to support microbiologists’ interpretation of suspected
urinary tract infections. Microbiol Open. 2020;9:E987.
Kim SY, Park Y, Kim H, et al. Rapid screening of urinary tract infection and discrimination of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria by automated flow cytometric analysis using Sysmex UF-5000. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(8):e02004-e02017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.