Post systems in prosthetic dentistry: Protetik diş hekimliğinde post sistemleri

Özge Parlar Öz; Aslı  Seçilmiş; Cemal Aydın

doi:10.5455/GMJ-30-171875

Authors

Özge Parlar Öz Department of Dentistry, Gaziantep 25 Aralık State Hospital
Aslı Seçilmiş Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University
Cemal Aydın Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5455/GMJ-30-171875

Keywords:

Post systems, metal, ceramic, fiber

Abstract

Different post-core systems were used to prosthodontic treatments for teeth, which were endodontically treated or had excessive loss of coronal tooth structures, from past to present. In the past, when only metal post systems were used, but because of rising aesthetic expectations and developing of adhesive dentistry, manufacturers have tried to find new materials, finally ceramic and fiber reinforced composite post systems have been developed. Each post system has its advantages and disadvantages. The success or failure of restoration is directly related to knowing the characteristics of the post. The most significant features of post systems are having similar physical properties to dentin, being compatible with the surrounding tissue and prosthetic restoration, causing minimal stress on teeth and being easy to practice. Aim of this review is to evaluate the post systems and examine the place of the future.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Theodosopoulou JN, Chochlidakis KM. A systematic review of dowel (post) and core materials and systems. J Prosthodont 2009;18(6):464-72.

Mo-rgano SM, Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70(1):11-6.

Martinez Insua A, Da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(5):527-32.

Sorensen J. Preservation of tooth structure. JCalif Dent Assoc 1988;16(11):15.

Yılmaz HY, Dinçer C, Nalbant L. Para-post sistemde uygulanan perlon pinlerin döküm sonrası çap değişimlerinin incelenmesi. Gazi Ü Diş Hek Fak1990 1990;7(1):139 - 46.

Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endodn 2004;30(5):289-301.

Deutsch AS, Musikant BL, Cavallari J, Lepley JB. Prefabricated dowels: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49(4):498-503.

Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17(3):307-12.

Koutayas SO, Kern M. All-ceramic posts and cores: the state of the art. Quintessence Int 1999;30(6):383-92.

Ottl P, Hahn L, Lauer HC, Fay M. Fracture characteristics of carbon fibre, ceramic and non‐palladium endodontic post systems at monotonously increasing loads. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29(2):175-83.

Kostka E, Roulet J. Textbook of endodontology. Blackwell Publishing Co:Singapore 2003;171-91.

Qualtrough A, Mannocci F. Tooth-colored post systems: a review. OperDent 2003;28(1):86-91.

Aydin C, Yilmaz H, Cağlar A. Effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the flexural strength of different denture base resins. Quintessence Int 2002;33(6):457-63.

Goto Y, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Junge T. Fatigue resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three dowel-and core systems. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93(1):45-50.

Bateman G, Ricketts D, Saunders W. Fibre-based post systems: a review. BrDentJ 2003;195(1):43-8.

Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999;1(2):153-8.

Gomes GM, Rezende E, Gomes O, Gomes JC, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Influence of the resin cement thickness on bond strength and gap formation of fiber posts bonded to root dentin. J Adhes Dent 2014;16(1):71-8.

Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Vichi A, Mason PN, Radovic I, et al. Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent2007;20(5):287-91.

Signore A, Kaitsas V, Ravera G, Angiero F, Benedicenti S. Clinical evaluation of an oval-shaped prefabricated glass fiber post in endodontically treated premolars presenting an oval root canal cross-section: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Prosthodont 2010;24(3):255-63.

Sterzenbach G, Franke A, Naumann M. Rigid versus flexible dentine like endodontic posts clinical testing of a biomechanical concept: Seven-year results of a randomized controlled clinical pilot trial on endodontically treated abutment teeth with severe hard tissue loss. J Endod 2012;38(12):1557-63.

Bitter K, Noetzel J, Stamm O, Vaudt J, Meyer-Lueckel H, Neumann K, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations: preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months. J Endod2009;35(11):1477-82.

Vallittu P, Lassila V. Reinforcement of acrylic resin denture base material with metal or fibre strengtheners. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19(3):225-30.

Karamustafa I. Fiberle güçlendirilmis farklı kompozit prefabrik mil sistemlerinin kompozit çekirdeklerle birlikte kullanımlarının dayanıklılık yönünden arastırılması.Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Phd Thesis, 125 pages, June 2006.

Kurtz J, Perdigão J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS, Bowles WR. Bond strengths of tooth-colored posts, effect of sealer, dentin adhesive, and root region. Am J Dent 2003;16:31-6.

Perdigão J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dent Mater 2006;22(8):752-8.

Goldberg A, Burstone C. The use of continuous fiber reinforcement in dentistry. Dent Mater 1992;8(3):197-202.

Artopoulou I, O'Keefe KL, Powers JM. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts. J Prosthodont 2006;15(3):172-9.

Powell DB, Nicholls JI, Yuodelis RA, Strygler H. A comparison of wire and kevlarreinforced provisional restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7(1):81-9.

Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Retention of a core material supported by three post head designs. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83(6):624-8.

Mannocci F, Sherriff M, Watson TF. Three point bending test of fiber posts. J Endod 2001;27(12):758-61.

Torbjörner A, Karlsson S, Syverud M, Hensten‐Pettersen A. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal posts Mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104(5‐6):605-11.

Toksavul S, Toman M, Uyulgan B, Schmage P, Nergiz I. Effect of luting agents and reconstruction techniques on the fracture resistance of prefabricated post systems. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32(6):433-40.

Kanie T, Arikawa H, Fujii K, Ban S. Impact strength of acrylic denture base resin reinforced with woven glass fiber. Dent Mater J 2003;22(1):30-8.

Vallittu P. Some aspects of the tensile strength of unidirectional glass fibre–polymethyl methacrylate composite used in dentures. J OralRehabil 1998;25(2):100-5.

Murphy J. Reinforced plastics handbook. Elsevier: Oxford 1998;63-106.

Akgungor G, Akkayan B. Influence of dentin bonding agents and polymerization modes on the bond strength between translucent fiber posts and three dentin regions within a post space. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95(5):368-78.

Kremeier K, Fasen L, Klaiber B, Hofmann N. Influence of endodontic post type (glass fiber, quartz fiber or gold) and luting material on push-out bond strength to dentin in vitro. Dent Mater 2008;24(5):660-6.

Akkayan B. An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced and zirconia dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92(2):155-62.

Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87(4):431-7.

Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber reinforced epoxy resin posts. IntJ Prosthodont 2003;16(1):39-44.

Braden M, Davy KW, Parker S, Ladizesky NH, Ward IM. Denture base poly (methyl methacrylate) reinforced with ultra-thin modulus polyethylene fibers,. Br Dent J. 1988;20;164(4):109-13.

Chow T, Cheng Y, Ladizesky N. Polyethylene fibre reinforced poly (methylmethacrylate) water sorption and dimensional changes during immersion. J Dent 1993;21(6):367-72.

Jagger D, Harrison A, Jandt K. The reinforcement of dentures. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26(3):185-94.

Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Caglar A, Yasar A. The effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the residual monomer content of two denture base resins. Quintessence Int 2003;34(2):148-53.

Kulunk S. Fiber postlara uygulanan farklı yuzey islemlerinin ve siman aralıklarının baglanma direncine etkisinin degerlendirilmesi. Samsun: Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, PhD thesis, 115 pages, June 2007

Dean JP, Jeansonne BG, Sarkar N. In vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber post. J Endod 1998;24(12):807-10.

Zhou L, Wang Q. Meta analysis of the comparison between cast metal posts' and fiber posts' clinical results. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2012;21(6):709-613.

Zhou L, Wang Q. Comparison of fracture resistance between cast posts and fiber posts: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod2013;39(1):11-5.

http://dis.ikc.edu.tr/sayfa/endonti (access date: 11.12.2014).

http://www.madeinlabs.com/conjointe.php (access date: 1.12.2014).

http://www.zongyandental.com/lucky-dental-Quartz-fiber post-with-straight-shape-p682.html (access date: 11.12.2014)