Publication Status of Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast Cells in Scientific Journals


Abstract views: 148 / PDF downloads: 94

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjther.2021.20111

Keywords:

Mouse, embryonic, fibroblast, bibliometric

Abstract

Objective: A bibliometric analysis was performed to investigate trends in mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells as a topic and also to compare the contributions of countries, journals, authors, keywords and citations. The elaboration of a strategic plan for the development of scientific research in stem cells and especially MEF as a research topic was analyzed. Methods: A bibliometric study was carried out on Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus databases comprising the period between 1991 and 2020. These papers were analyzed and evaluated in terms of all years, field parameters (authors, keywords, affiliations, funding agencies, authors’ nationalities, article type, networks, h-index of journals and authors) and citations. Results: As a result of the conducted research, it was found that the WOS and Scopus had published 1,255 and 6,562 papers, respectively, on ‘Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast’ as topic and article title, abstract and keywords. The articles are analyzed by bibliometric techniques in this study. Conclusion: On analysis of papers related to the main parameters of MEF, it has been ascertained that the MEF-related articles published in the journals within the scope of Science Citation Index (SCI)/Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) was quite high and is growing rapidly. The medical publication feature has been characterized by international visibility and extensive networking with many foreign research structures. The number of citations was increasing significantly. The publishing patterns were different depending on the area of interest. These data are useful in studying the dynamical nature of science and can help in planning newer studies for researchers.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Duval M. Atlas d’embryologie. Paris: G. Masson, 1889.

Virchow R. Genauere Geschichte der Fettmetamorphose. Virchow R. Die Cellularpathologie in ihrer Begru¨ndung auf physiologische

und pathologische Gewebelehre. Berlin, Germany: Verlag von August Hirschwald, 1858:312-333.

Croft C. Ultrastructural features of wound healing in mouse skin. J Anat 1969;105;189-190.

Lynch MD, Watt FM. Fibroblast heterogeneity: Implications for human disease. J Clin Investig. 2018;128(1):26-35.

Ichim TE, O’Heeron P, Kesari S. Fibroblasts as a practical alternative to mesenchymal stem cells. J Trans Med. 2018;16(1):212.

Haarr L, Kleppe K, Lillehaug JR. Changes in polypeptide-synthesis and glycosylation in mouse embryonic fibroblast C3h/10t1/2-Cl-8

cells caused by the tumor promoter 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986;889(3):334-345.

Tobioka M, Biesele JJ. Mitochondria in living cells: An analysis of movements. J Cell Biol. 1956;2(4):319-324.

Qin Y, Shin JH, Yoon J-H, Park S-H. Embryonic fibroblasts promote antitumor cytotoxic effects of CD8þ T cells. Front Immunol.

;9:685.

Bozkurt AS. An Investigation of the Effect of Extracellular Vesicles Isolated from Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts on Wound Healing in an Experimental Diabetic Mouse Model [PhD thesis]. Department of Physiology, University of Gaziantep, 2018:7-10.

Kalluri R, Zeisberg M. Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(5):392-401.

Ortega N, Behonick DJ, Werb Z. Matrix remodeling during endochondral ossification. Trends Cell Biol. 2004;14(2):86-93.

Hernandez MR. The optic nerve head in glaucoma: Role of astrocytes in tissue remodeling. Prog Retinal Eye Res. 2000;19(3):297-

Davis GE, Senger DR. Endothelial extracellular matrix: Biosynthesis, remodeling, and functions during vascular morphogenesis and

neovessel stabilization. Circ Res. 2005;97:1093-1107.

Shapiro SD, Senior RM. Matrix metalloproteinases: Matrix degradation and more. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1999;20(6):1100-1102.

Birbrair A, Zhang T, Files DK, et al. Type-1 pericytes accumulate after tissue injury and produce collagen in an organ-dependent

manner. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;5(6):122.

Gabdoulline R, Kaisers W, Gasper A, et al. Differences in the early development of human and mouse embryonic stem cells. PLoS

One. 2015;10(10):e0140803.

Diodato VP, Gellatly P. Dictionary of Bibliometrics. London: Routledge, 2013.

McBurney MK, Novak PL. What is bibliometrics and why should you care? In Proceedings of the IEEE International Professional Communication Conference. 2002. IEEE.

Guz A, Rushchitsky J. Citation analysis of publications of NASU mechanicians in the database of the Thomson Reuters Institute

for Scientific Information. Int Appl Mech. 2009;45(7):699.

Rousseau R, Egghe L, Guns R. Becoming Metric-Wise: A Bibliometric Guide for Researchers. Sawston, Cambridge: Chandos Publishing, 2018.

Bibliometrix R Package. 2019. https://www.bibliometrix.org. Accessed 9 July 2020.

Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrere F. h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for

different scientific fields. J Inform. 2009;3(4):273-289.

Egghe L. The Hirsch index and related impact measures. Ann Rev Inform Sci Technol. 2010;44(1):65-114.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-28

How to Cite

Bozkurt, A. S. (2021). Publication Status of Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast Cells in Scientific Journals. European Journal of Therapeutics, 27(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjther.2021.20111

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Categories