Reliability of Different Predictive Systems in Major  Gastrointestinal Surgical Patients: Major Gastrointestinal Cerrahi Hastalarında Farklı Prediktif Sistemlerin  Güvenilirliği

Mehmet Özdoğan; Rıza Haldun  Gündoğdu; Faruk Karateke; Eren Ersoy; Ebru  Menekşe; Hatice Kaya Özdoğan; Ali Önder  Devay; Adnan  Kuvvetli

doi:10.5455/GMJ-30-166055

Authors

Mehmet Özdoğan Medical Park Hospital
Rıza Haldun Gündoğdu Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, 3. General Surgery Clinics
Faruk Karateke Numune Training and Research Hospital, General Surgery Clinics
Eren Ersoy Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, 3. General Surgery Clinics
Ebru Menekşe Numune Training and Research Hospital, General Surgery Clinics
Hatice Kaya Özdoğan Numune Training and Research Hospital, General Surgery Clinics
Ali Önder Devay Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, 3. General Surgery Clinics
Adnan Kuvvetli Numune Training and Research Hospital, General Surgery Clinics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5455/GMJ-30-166055

Keywords:

APACHE II, SAPS, MPM, POSSUM, NRS-2002, mortality prediction

Abstract

APACHE II-III, SAPS II, and MPM II are commonly used predictive models. The systems designed for surgical patients include the ASA and P-POSSUM. NRS-2002 score is suggested for screening of nutritional risk. We aimed to assess the performance of prognostic models, and to compare the reliability of NRS-2002 with those, in major gastrointestinal surgical patients. APACHE II and III, SAPS II, MPM II and P-POSSUM scores, ASA grading, and NRS-2002 scores of the patients underwent major gastrointestinal surgery were collected on admission. Calculations were repeated for APACHE II and III, SAPS II, and MPM II at postoperative 24th hour. Discrimination and calibration characteristics of the scoring systems were evaluated.APACHE II-III, and SAPS II at postoperative 24th hour, and P-POSSUM on admission, had reliable power of discrimination and calibration for mortality prediction in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. APACHE III, SAPS II and PPOSSUM had the best performance on complication prediction. ASA, MPM II, and NRS-2002 had insufficient discrimination statistics. APACHE II and III, SAPS II, and P-POSSUM are superior to other systems in predicting mortality in gastrointestinal surgical patients. APACHE III, SAPS II, and P-POSSUM are superior in predicting complication.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Boyd O, Jackson N. How is risk defined in high-risk surgical patient management? Crit Care 2005;9:390-396.

Le Gall JR. The use of severity scores in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:1618-1623.

Correia MI, Waitzberg DL. The impact of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and costs evaluated through a multivariate model analysis. Clin Nutr 2003;22:235-239.

Reilly JJ Jr, Hull SF, Albert N, et al. Economic impact of malnutrition: a model system for hospitalized patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1988;12:371-376.

Kuzu MA, Terzioğlu H, Genç V, et al. Preoperative nutritional risk assessment in predicting postoperative outcome in patients undergoing major surgery. World J Surg 2006;30:378-390.

Schneider SM, Veyres P, Pivot X, et al. Malnutrition is an independent factor associated with nosocomial infections. Br J Nutr 2004;92:105-111.

Correia MI, Waitzberg DL. The impact of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and costs evaluated through a multivariate model analysis. Clin Nutr 2003;22:235-239.

Waitzberg DL, Saito H, Plank LD, et al. Postsurgical infections are reduced with specialized nutrition support. World J Surg 2006;30:1592-1604.

Xu J, Zhong Y, Jing D, et al. Preoperative enteral immunonutrition improves postoperative outcome in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. World J Surg 2006; 30:1284-1289.

Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, et al. Educational and Clinical Practice Committee, European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN). ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr 2003;22:415-421.

Johansen N, Kondrup J, Plum LM, et al. Effect of nutritional support on clinical outcome in patients at nutritional risk. Clin Nutr 2004;23:539-550.

Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, et al. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr 2003;22:321-336.

Sorensen J, Kondrup J, Prokopowicz J, et al; EuroOOPS study group. EuroOOPS: An international, multicentre study to implement nutritional risk screening and evaluate clinical outcome. Clin Nutr 2008;27:340-349.

Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36.

Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr. A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 1982;115:92-106.

Ribeiro KC, Kowalski LP. APACHE II, POSSUM and ASA scores and the risk of perioperative complications in patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:739-745.

Jones HJ, de Cossart L. Risk scoring in surgical patients. Br J Surg 1999;86:149-157.

Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, et al. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality.Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg 1998;85:1217-1220.

Tekkis PP, Kocher HM, Bentley AJ, et al. Operative mortality rates among surgeons: comparison of POSSUM and p POSSUM scoring systems in gastrointestinal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1528-1532.

den Boer S, de Keizer NF, de Jonge E. Performance of prognostic models in critically ill cancer patients - a review. Crit Care 2005;9:R458-463.

Rutledge R, Fakhry S, Rutherford E, et al. Comparison of APACHE II, Trauma Score, and Injury Severity Score as predictors of outcome in critically injured trauma patients. Am J Surg 1993;166:244-247.

Altomare DF, Serio G, Pannarale OC, et al. Prediction of mortality by logistic regression analysis in patients with postoperative enterocutaneous fistulae. Br J Surg 1990;77:450-453.

Koperna T, Semmler D, Marian F. Risk stratification in emergency surgical patients: is the APACHE II score a reliable marker of physiological impairment? Arch Surg 2001;136:55-59.

Grant CA, Dempsey GA, Lowe D, et al. APACHE II scoring for the prediction of immediate surgical complications in head and neck cancer patients. Plast.Reconstr. Surg, 2007;119:1751-1758.

Goffi L, Saba V, Ghiselli R, et al. Preoperative APACHE II and ASA scores in patients having major general surgical operations: prognostic value and potential clinical applications. Eur J Surg 1999;165:730-735.

Kilic YA, Dogrul AB, Karakoc D. Impact of organ failure on mortality prediction in a Turkish surgical intensive care unit. Int Care Med 2005;31(suppl):S47.

Arabi Y, Al Shirawi N, Memish Z, et al. Assessment of six mortality prediction models in patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock to the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care 2003;7:R116-122.

Schiesser M, Müller S, Kirchhoff P, et al. Assessment of a novel screening score for nutritional risk in predicting complications in gastro-intestinal surgery. Clin Nutr 2008;27:565-570.

Kyle UG, Kossovsky MP, Karsegard VL, et al. Comparison of tools for nutritional assessment and screening at hospital admission: a population study. Clin Nutr 2006;25:409-417