Restoration of endodontically treated teeth

Samet Tosun; Abdül Semih Özsevik; Uğur Aydın

doi:10.5578/GMJ.27963

Authors

Samet Tosun Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep
Abdül Semih Özsevik Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep
Uğur Aydın Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5578/GMJ.27963

Keywords:

Endodontically treated teeth, permanent dental restoration, clinical success

Abstract

The maintanence of endodontically treated teeth is important for oral rehabilitation. The successfull treatment of endodontically treated tooth depends not only on good endodontic threapy, but also on good restorative treatment of the tooth after endodontic therapy is completed. Many studies have demonstrated that there is a direct relationship between the quality of the restoration of endodontically treated teeth with clinical success. Excessively damaged endodontically treated teeth can be successfully treated with restorations supported throughout the root canal. In this review, treatment planning and options of endodontically treated teeth will be examined.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Yıkılgan İ, Bala O. Endodontik tedavi görmüş dişlerin konservatif restorasyonları. Acta Odontol Turcica 2013;30(1):44-8.

Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu L-S, Loushine BA, Weller RN, Loushine RJ, et al. Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fi llings on success of root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2011;37(7):895-902.

Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Deny Mater 2012;28(1):87-101.

Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Endodontically treated teeth as abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53(5):631-6.

Peroz I, Blankenstein F, Lange K-P, Naumann M. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores-a review. Quintessence Int 2005; 36(9):737-46.

Pilo R, Tamse A. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with gates glidden and ParaPost drills. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83(6):617-23.

McDonald A, King P, Setchell D. An in vitro study to compare impact fracture resistance of intact root‐treated teeth. Int Endod J 1990;23(6):304-12.

Strub J, Pontius O, Koutayas S. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artifi cial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28(2):120-4.

Burke F, Shaglouf A, Combe E, Wilson N. Fracture resistance of fi ve pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation. Operative Dent 1999;25(5):388-94.

Isidor F, Brøndum K, Ravnholt G. The infl uence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 1998;12(1):78-82.

Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Edward J, JE S. Sturdevant’s Art & Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2010.

Eklund SA. Trends in dental treatment, 1992 to 2007. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141(4):391-9.

Hood J. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth: some clinical implications. Int Dent J 1991;41(1):25-32.

Hansen EK, Asmussen E, Christiansen NC. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam. Dent Traumatol 1990;6(2):49-55.

Ergücü Z, Türkün LS. Clinical performance of novel resin composites in posterior teeth: 18-month results. J Adhes Dent 2007;9(2):209-16.

Schirrmeister JF, Huber K, Hellwig E, Hahn P. Four-year evaluation of a resin composite including nanofi llers in posterior cavities. J Adhes Dent 2009;11(5):399-404.

Chang M, Dennison J, Yaman P. Physical property evaluation of four composite materials. Operative Dent 2013;38(5):144-53.

Kijsamanmith K, Timpawat S, Harnirattisai C, Messer H. Micro‐ tensile bond strengths of bonding agents to pulpal fl oor dentine. Inter Endod J 2002;35(10):833-9.

Cho GC, Kaneko LM, Donovan TE, White SN. Diametral and compressive strength of dental core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82(3):272-6.

Dayangaç B. Kompozit rezin restorasyonlar: Güneş Kitabevi; 2000.

St-Georges AJ, Sturdevant JR, Swift Jr EJ, Thompson JY. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89(6):551-7.

Hürmüzlü F, Kiremitci A, Serper A, Altundaşar E, Sİso ŞH. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with ormocer and packable composite. J Endod 2003;29(12):838-40.

Soares PV, Santos-Filho PCF, Gomide HA, Araujo CA, Martins LRM, Soares CJ. Infl uence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.: Part II: Strain measurement and stress distribution. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99(2):114- 22.

Monga P, Sharma V, Kumar S. Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent:2009;12(4):154.

Stampalia L, Nicholls J, Brudvik J, Jones D. Fracture resistance of teeth with. rasin-bonded restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55(6):694-98.

Hansen E. In vivo cusp fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with MOD amalgam or MOD resin fi llings. Dent Mater 1988;4(4):169-73.

Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Ford T. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(3):297-301.

Yıldırım C, Aydin U, Özsevik S, Aksoy F, Tosun S. Effect of coronal cement base and its thickniss on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Restor Dent 2015;3(1):8-13.

Garoushi S, Tanner J, Vallittu P, Lassila L. Preliminary clinical evaluation of short fi ber-reinforced composite resin in posterior teeth: 12-months report. Open Dent J 2012;6:41.

Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Short glass fi ber reinforced restorative composite resin with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix. Dent Mater 2007;23(11):1356-62.

Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Watts DC, Lassila LV. Polymerization shrinkage of experimental short glass fi ber-reinforced composite with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix. Dent Mater 2008;24(2):211-5.

Wagnild GW, Mueller KI. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Pathways of the pulp 2002;9.

Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosth Dent 1984;51(6):780-4.

Nayyar A, Walton RE, Leonard LA. An amalgam coronal-radicular dowel and core technique for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosth Dent 1980;43(5):511-5.

Tinschert J, Zwez D, Marx R, Anusavice K. Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica-and zirconia-based ceramics. J Dent 2000;28(7):529-35.

Hudis SI, Goldstein GR. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a review of the literature. J Prosth Dent 1986;55(1):33-8.

Plasmans P, Creugers N, Mulder J. Long-term survival of extensive amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 1998;77(3):453-60.

Atasoy-Ulusoy Öİ, Genç Ö, Görgül G, Küçükeşmen C. Posterior kompozit ve amalgamla restore edilmiş endodontik tedavili maksiller premolar dişlerin kırılmaya dayanıklılığı. AÜ. Diş Hek Fak Derg 2006;33(1):63-7.

Mondelli RFL, Ishikiriama SK, Oliveira Filho Od, Mondelli J. Fracture resistance of weakened teeth restored with condensable resin with and without cusp coverage. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17(3):161-5.

ElAyouti A, Serry M, Geis‐Gerstorfer J, Löst C. Infl uence of cusp coverage on the fracture resistance of premolars with endodontic access cavities. Int Endod J 2011;44(6):543-9.

Mohammadi N, Kahnamoii MA, Yeganeh PK, Navimipour EJ. Effect of fi ber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin. J Endod 2009;35(10):1428-32.

Scotti N, Scansetti M, Rota R, Pera F, Pasqualini D, Berutti E. The effect of the post length and cusp coverage on the cycling and static load of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Clin Oral İnvest 2011;15(6):923-9.

Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Cağlar A, Yaşar A. The effect of glass fi ber reinforcement on the residual monomer content of two denture base resins. Quintessence int (Berlin, Germany: 1985) 2003;34(2):148-53.

Sengun A, Cobankara FK, Orucoglu H. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Traumatol 2008;24(2):214-9.

Oskoee PA, Ajami AA, Navimipour EJ, Oskoee SS, Sadjadi J. The effect of three composite fi ber insertion techniques on fracture resistance of root-fi lled teeth. J Endod 2009;35(3):413-6.

Belli S, Erdemir A, Yildirim C. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fi bre in root‐fi lled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques. Inter Endod J 2006;39(2):136-42.

Ferrari M, Vichi A. Metarials and lutind cement for indirect restoration. In: Roulet JF, Wilson NHF, editors. Advences in operative dentistry: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 2001:95-107.

Alfredo Filho M, Vieira LCC, Araujo E, Baratieri LN. Ceramic inlays and onlays: clinical procedures for predictable results. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15(6):338-52.

Jedynakiewicz N, Martin N. CEREC: science, research, and clinical application. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995) 2001;22(6):7-13.

Alaçam T. Endodontik tedavi sonrası onarım. Ankara: Endodonti Özyurt Matbaacılık, 2012;1059-48.

Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Prac Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994;7(5):83-94.

Magne P, Knezevic A. Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int 2009;40(2):125-33.

Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27(1):1-16.

Öz ÖP, Seçilmiş A, Aydın C. Post systems in prosthetic dentistry. Gaziantep Med J 2015;21(1):51-5.

Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part I. Success and failure data, treatment concepts. J Prosthodont 1994;3(4):243-50.

Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study. J Dent 2001;29(6):427-33.

Schwartz R, Jordan R. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: the endodontist’s perspective, Part 1. Endodontics: Colleagues for Excellence-AAE Spring/Summer 2004:1-6.

Reid LC, Kazemi RB, Meiers JC. Effect of fatigue testing on core integrity and post microleakage of teeth restored with different post systems. J Endod 2003;29(2):125-31.

Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87(4):431-7.

Stricker EJ, Göhring TN. Infl uence of different posts and cores on marginal adaptation, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of composite resin crowns on human mandibular premolars. An in vitro study. J Dent 2006;34(5):326-35.

Zhou L, Wang Q. Comparison of fracture resistance between cast posts and fi ber posts: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod 2013;39(1):11-5.