Normal Main Portal Vein Diameter - Is the Upper  Limit Of 13 Mm Low?

Hale Çolakoğlu Er; Buğra Tolga Konduk

doi:10.5152/eurjther.2019.19092

Authors

Hale Çolakoğlu Er Department of Radiology, Gaziantep University School of Medicine, Gaziantep https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5210-734X
Buğra Tolga Konduk Department of Gastroenterology, Gaziantep University School of Medicine, Gaziantep https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9138-9984

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjther.2019.19092

Keywords:

Computed tomography, mean diameter, portal vein, portal hypertension, upper limit

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to compare the normal main portal vein diameter measured in computed tomography with the commonly used upper limit value.
Methods: Computed tomography examinations performed between March 2015 and April 2018 in our department were scanned from the archive system. Mean portal vein diameters were measured on axial contrast-enhanced and non-enhanced abdominal CT scans of the patients without any known disease.
Results: 500 main portal vein measurements were performed from 276 individuals. In the non-enhanced images (n = 243), the mean diameter of main portal vein was 15.03 ± 1.72 mm and in the post-contrast enhanced images (n = 257) the mean diameter of the main portal vein was 15,05 ± 1.71 mm. These values showed a significant difference from the widely accepted upper limit of 13 mm (95% confidence interval for non-enhanced images: 1.81-2.25 mm higher, p <0.001, 95% confidence interval for post-contrast images: 1.84-2.26 mm higher, p <0.001). The mean main portal vein diameter measured from contrast tomography images was 0.26 mm wider than the mean main portal vein diameter measured at non-enhanced images (95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.29 mm, p <0.001).
Conclusion: The mean normal portal vein diameter measured in computed tomography (15.05 mm) was significantly higher than the accepted upper limit of 13 mm (p <0.0001). The mean main portal vein diameter in contrast-enhanced tomography was 0.26 mm larger than the mean main portal vein diameter measured in the non-enhanced examination.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Sarwar S, Khan AA, Alam A, Butt AK, Shafqat F, Malik K, et al. Non-endoscopic prediction of presence of esophageal varices in cirrhosis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2005; 15: 528-31.

Al-Nakshabandi NA. The role of ultrasonography in portal hypertension. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 111-7.

Webb LJ, Berger LA, Sherlock S. Grey-scale ultrasonography of portal vein. Lancet 1977; 2: 675-7.

Nestaiko OV, Iarovoi AV, Bekov AD. [Ultrasonographic symptoms of portal hypertension]. Med Radiol (Mosk) 1991; 36: 4-6.

Bolondi L, Gandolfi L, Arienti V, Caletti GC, Corcioni E, Gasbarrini G, et al. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of portal hypertension: diminished response of portal vessels to respiration. Radiology 1982; 142: 167-72.

Weinreb J, Kumari S, Phillips G, Pochaczevsky R. Portal vein measurements by real-time sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982; 139: 497-9.

Niederau C, Sonnenberg A, Muller JE, Erckenbrecht JF, Scholten T, Fritsch WP. Sonographic measurements of the normal liver, spleen, pancreas, and portal vein. Radiology 1983; 149: 537-40.

Rumack CM WS, Charboneasu. Diagnostic ultrasound: St. Louis: Mosby; 2011.

Weissleder R RM, Wittenberg J. Primer of diagnostic imaging imaging. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011.

Kurtz AB MW, Hertzberg BS. Ultrasound. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004.

Stamm ER, Meier JM, Pokharel SS, Clark T, Glueck DH, Lind KE, et al. Normal main portal vein diameter measured on CT is larger than the widely referenced upper limit of 13 mm. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41: 1931-6.

O’Donohue J, Ng C, Catnach S, Farrant P, Williams R. Diagnostic value of Doppler assessment of the hepatic and portal vessels and ultrasound of the spleen in liver disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 16: 147-55.