The Change of Oral Presentations of National Anatomy Congresses Over the Years


Abstract views: 243 / PDF downloads: 189

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther-343

Keywords:

National anatomy congresses, oral presentation, publication rate

Abstract

Objective: In this study, it is aimed to examine the characteristics and publication rates of oral presentations presented in national congresses.
Methods: The data about the oral presentations in national anatomy congresses (from 2016 to 2021), including the number of contributing institutions, the institutions that contributed the most oral presentations each year, and the publication rates of the oral presentations in the journals scanned in different indexes. In the study, the titles and the keywords were scanned using Google Scholar and Web of Science, and journal index details were noted.
Results: Of the national congresses we examined in our study, the most oral presentations (193) were the congress in 2019 and the least oral presentations (47) were the congress in 2017. The publication rate of oral presentations was highest in the papers of the congress in 2016 (42%) and at least in the papers of the congress in 2019 (13%). None of the oral presentations in the last congress held in 2021 were published until the time of our study. Large proportions (34%) of the papers that are accepted as oral presentations and published are radiological studies. 70% of the publications were published in journals indexed in Web of Science.
Conclusion: For both new and senior academics, congresses offer a useful and distinctive setting. Congress papers showcase the scientific opportunities and interests of various universities while also providing opportunities for collaboration. Attendance at a conference is significantly influenced by its location, timing, and financial situation.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Gürses İA, Gayretli Ö, Gürtekin B, Öztürk A. Publication Rates and Inconsistencies of the Abstracts Presented at the National Anatomy Congresses in 2007 and 2008. Balkan Med J 2017;34:64-70

von Elm E, Costanza MC, Walder B, Tramer MR. More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:12.

Tok Cekmecelioglu B, Kozanhan B, Eren G. Publication rate of abstracts orally presented at the Turkish Society of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation National Congresses. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim, 2019; 47(2): 151-7.

Craggs R, Mahony M. The geographies of the conference: Knowledge, performance and protest. Geogr Compass, 2014, 8(6): 414-430.

Akademik Teşvik Ödeneği Yönetmeliği. T.C. Resmi Gazete, Tarihi: 14.05.2018, Sayı: 11834.

Doçentlik Yönetmeliği. T.C. Resmi Gazete, Tarihi:15.04.2018, Sayı: 30392.

Pavluković V, Cimbaljevi M. Factors affecting conference participation decision-making. J Geogr Inst Jovan Cvijić SASA, 2020, 70(1), 31-43.

Tonbul Y., Ata Çiğdem F. Bilimsel Kongrelerin Verimliliği ve Akademisyenlerin Anlam Dünyasındaki Yeri. J Higher Edu Sci. 2022; 12(2): 358-368.

Adanır SS., Bahşi İ, Kervancıoğlu P, Orhan M, Cihan ÖF. Bibliometric analysis of articles published in Anatomy, the official publication of the Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy between 2007–2018. Anatomy. 2020; 14(1): 39-43.

Bahşi I, Adanır SS., Kervancıoğlu P, Orhan M, Govsa F. A bibliometric analysis of Turkey’s research activity in the anatomy & morphology category from the Web of Science database. Eur J Ther, 2021, 10.

Tani E. Türkiye’de Akademik Bilgi Üretimi-I: Akademik Kongrelere Dair İzlenimler. Düşünce ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2020; 2(2), 119-132.

Gattrell WT, Barraux A, Comley S, Whaley M, Lander N. Comparison of the carbon costs of in-person and virtual conferences–lessons from the coronavirus pandemic. In European meeting of the International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP), 2021.

Fleming TR., Labriola D, Wittes J. Conducting clinical research during the COVID-19 pandemic: protecting scientific integrity. JAMA, 2020, 324.1: 33-34.

Welsh J, Lu Y, Dhruva SS, Bikdeli B, Desai NR, Benchetrit L, et al. Age of Data at the Time of Publication of Contemporary Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open. 2018; 1(4):e181065.

Kahve AC, Kaya H, Aşut G, Büyüklüoğlu N, Çakıl AG. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the psychiatry national congresses held by the psychiatric association of turkey: Turk Psikiyatri Derg, 2020; 31(2), 99-105.

Yalcinkaya M, Bagatur A E. Fate of abstracts presented at a National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congress: publication rates and consistency of abstracts compared with their subsequent full-text publications. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2013, 47(4): 223-230.

Şahin Ersoy G, Eken, M, Öztekin D, Çöğendez E,Eroğlu M. The International publication rates of abstracts presented in The National Gynecology and Obstetrics Meetings in the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility. Zeynep Kamil Med J, 2015, 46.2: 63-68.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-30

How to Cite

Özkan, M., & Dinçel, Y. M. (2023). The Change of Oral Presentations of National Anatomy Congresses Over the Years. European Journal of Therapeutics, 29(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther-343

Issue

Section

Original Articles