Is the Text of Ibn Lūqā “A New Evidence” on Pulmonary Circulation Discovery?

Ahmet Acıduman; Abdullah Yıldız; Kemal Tuzcu; Hicabi Kırlangıç

doi:10.58600/eurjther1913

Authors

Ahmet Acıduman Department of History of Medicine and Ethics, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2021-4471
Abdullah Yıldız Department of History of Medicine and Ethics, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5135-7200
Kemal Tuzcu Sub-Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Department of Eastern Languages and Literature, Faculty of Languages and History-Geography, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6537-7106
Hicabi Kırlangıç Sub-Department of Persian Language and Literature, Department of Eastern Languages and Literature, Faculty of Languages and History-Geography, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6273-5342

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1913

Keywords:

Pulmonary circulation, lesser circulation, history of medicine, history of cardiovascular system

Abstract

Objective: The discovery of the pulmonary circulation is one of the most important issues in the history of medicine. Recently, an article appeared comprising an assertion that this discovery may have been made before Ibn al-Nafīs by Qusṭā b. Lūqā. The purpose of our study is to examine the text of Qusṭā b. Lūqā to ascertain whether it offers “new evidence” on the discovery of pulmonary circulation.

Methods: A comprehensive analysis of the text Qusṭā b. Lūqā and its different copies referenced for the discovery made by Qusṭā b. Lūqā has been made regarding the history of medicine.

Results: While Qusṭā b. Lūqā’s text contains detailed descriptions of cardiovascular anatomy, the terminologies and concepts employed were consistent with the prevailing medical knowledge of his time. From the perspective of the history of medicine, it can be said that Qusṭā b. Lūqā’s text does not sufficiently differentiate from those of his predecessors’ regarding the issue of pulmonary circulation. In addition, Qusṭā b. Lūqā mentions the sources he used in his text and does not explicitly claim that he made a discovery different from them.

Conclusion: With the available findings, it is difficult for now to say that Qusṭā b. Lūqā discovered the pulmonary circulation in the referenced text.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

West JB (2011). The Human Pulmonary Circulation: Historical Introduction. In: Yuan JXJ, Garcia JGN, West JB, Hales CA, Rich S, Archer SL (eds). Textbook of Pulmonary Vascular Disease. Springer US, pp 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87429-6_1

Loukas M, Lam R, Tubbs RS, Shoja MM, Apaydin N (2008) Ibn al-Nafis (1210–1288): The First Description of the Pulmonary Circulation. Am Surg. 74(5):440-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313480807400517

Meyerhof M (1935). Ibn An-Nafîs (XIIIth Cent.) and His Theory of the Lesser Circulation. Isis. 23(1):100-120. https://doi.org/10.1086/346938

West JB (2008) Ibn al-Nafis, the Pulmonary Circulation, and the Islamic Golden Age. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105.

Mahlooji K, Abdoli M, Tekiner H, Zargaran A (2021) A new evidence on pulmonary circulation discovery: A text of Ibn Luqa (860–912 AD). Eur Heart J. 42(26):2522-2523. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab039

Qosta b. Luqa (1953) The Book of the Difference Between the Spirit and the Soul [Le Livre De La Différence Entre L’esprit et L’âme]. In: Ülken HZ (ed), İbn Sina Risaleleri 2 Les Opuscules D’Ibn Sina et Le Livre De La Différence Entre L’esprit et L’âme. İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayınları, İstanbul, pp 81-108 ([In Arabic])

Cheikho L (ed) (1996) Booklet on the Difference Between the Spirit and the Soul [Risāla fī l-farq baina r-rūḥ wa n-nafs]. In: Sezgin F (ed). Islamic Medicine. Volume 34. Qusṭā ibn Lūqā (3rd/9th cent.) Text and Studies, Collected and Reprinted. Institute for the History of Arabic-Islamic Science at the Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, pp 151-166 ([In Arabic])

Gabrieli G (1996) The Risālah of Qusṭā b. Lūqā “On the Difference Between the Spirit and the Soul” [La Risālah di Qusṭā b. Lūqā “Sulla Differenza Tra Lo Spirito E L’anima”]. In: Sezgin F (ed). Islamic Medicine. Volume 34. Qusṭā ibn Lūqā (3rd/9th cent.) Text and Studies, Collected and Reprinted. Institute for the History of Arabic-Islamic Science at the Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, pp 168-201 ([In Italian and Arabic])

Aydın H (1999) Kusta b. Luka and His Book the Distinction between the Spirit and the Soul [Kusta b. Luka ve Ruh ile Nefs Arasındaki Ayırım Adlı Kitabı]. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. 40:387-402 ([In Turkish])

Kusta b. Luka el-Yunânî (2009) About the Difference Between the Spirit and the Soul [Ruh ve Nefs Arasındaki Fark Hakkında], Üçer İH (trans). M.Ü. İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. 36:195-208 ([In Turkish])

Barach CS (ed) (1878). Bibliotheca Philoaophorum Mediae Aetatis. II. Excerpta E Libro Alfredi Anglici De Motu Cordis Item Costa-Ben-Lucae De Differentia Anima Et Spiritus Liber Translatus A Johanne Hispalensi. Als Beitraege zur Geschichte der Anthropologie und Psyclogie des Mittelalters. Verlag Der Wagner’schen Universitaets-Buchhandlung, Innsbruck. ([In Latin])

Wilcox J (1985) The Transmission and Influence of Qusta Ibn Luqa’s “On the Difference Between Spirit and the Soul”. A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The City University of New York.

Qusṭā b. Lūqā (2017). The Difference between Spirit and Soul [Farq Bayna Rūḥ wa Nafs]. Zāhedī B (ed, trans). Mūlā, Tehran. ([In Persian and Arabic])

Galen (1956) On Anatomical Procedures. Translation of the Surviving Books with Introduction and Notes by Singer C. Published for The Wellcome Historical Medical Museum by Geoffrey Cumberlege Oxford University Press, London, New York, Toronto.

Galen (1968) On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body: Peri Chreias Moriōn [romanized Form] De Usu Partium. Vol. I-II. Translated from the Greek with an Introduction and Commentary by May MT. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

Galeni De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis, edidit, in linguam Anglicam vertit, commentatus est Ph. De Lacy, CMG V 4,1,2, 3 vol., Berlin 1978-1984; vol. I: editio tertia lucis ope expressa, vol. II: editio altera lucis ope expressa, vol. III: editio altera lucis ope expressa addendis et corrigendis aucta, Berlin 2005. https://cmg.bbaw.de/epubl/online/cmg_05_04_01_02.php?p=65=609 Accessed 15 Oct 2023