Readability and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Information Concerning Post-Endodontic Treatment Selection

Abstract views: 179 / PDF downloads: 176




Patient education, Readability, Postendodontic restoration, DISCERN, Access to information


Objectives: This study aimed to unbiasedly identify the quality and readability of the written information about post-endodontic coronal restorations on Turkish websites using accepted formulas and scales by the literature.

Methods: The study was carried out by setting national pages and national locations in the Google search engine. The terms "root canal treatment and veneer" and "root canal treatment and filling" were used as keywords. The webpages were assessed independently by two readability formulas (Flesh-Kincaid and Ateşman systems) and DISCERN quality kit. The independent statistical and correlation analysis were performed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Shapiro-Wilk, Spearman's rho, and Dunn's tests. The significance level was taken as p<0.05.

Results: The initial search identified 60 websites, of which eight were excluded due to non-compliance with the study criteria (n=52). According to the DISCERN score, the web pages were categorized as fair with the highest rate of 57.69%. A statistically significant positive correlation was found between Ateşman Readability Index and the Flesh-Kincaid Reading Ease score (r=0.998; p<0.001). There was no statistically significant correlation between Ateşman Readability Index and DISCERN score (p=0.259). Ateşman reading ease scores of the web pages are evaluated, 80.76% of these are classified as moderately difficult.

Conclusions: The readability distribution of the written information about post-endodontic coronal restorations on websites was acceptable to the majority. However, being readable does not indicate that it provides sufficient target technical information. In this context, it can be suggested to use readability and quality scales while preparing websites for dental patient education concerning post-endodontic coronal restorations.


Metrics Loading ...


Akbulut AS (2022) Readability Analysis of Information on The Internet About Clear Aligner Treatment. NEU Dent J. 4:7-11.

Tan SS, Goonawardene N (2017) Internet Health Information Seeking and the Patient-Physician Relationship: A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 19:9.

AlGhamdi KM, Moussa NA (2012) Internet Use by the Public to Search For Health-Related Information. Int J Med Inform. 81:363-73.

Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER (2002) Empirical Studies Assessing the Quality of Health Information For Consumers on the World Wide Web: A Systematic Review. JAMA. 287:2691-2700.

Değirmenci K (2022) Evaluation of Readability Levels of Turkish Internet Sites Providing Information About Dental Prosthesis: A Qualitative Research. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 28:905-912.

Miguéns-Vila R, Ledesma-Ludi Y, Rodríguez-Lozano F, Varela-Centelles P, Seoane-Romero JM, Castelo-Baz P (2018) Disparities Between English and Spanish in Readability of Online Endodontic Information for Laypeople. J Am Dent Assoc 149:960-966.

Basch CH, Ethan D, Cadorett V, Kollia B, Clark A (2019) An Assessment of the Readability of Online Material Related to Fluoride. J Prev Interv Community. 47:5-13.

Jo JH, Kim EJ, Kim JR, Kim MJ, Chung JW, Park JW (2018) Quality and Readability f Internet-Based Information on Halitosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 125:215-212.

Flesch, R (2007) Flesch-Kincaid Readability Test. Retrieved October. 26.3 2007.

Ateşman E (1997) Türkçede Okunabilirliğin Ölçülmesi. A U Tömer Lang J. 58:171-174.

Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R (1999) DISCERN: An Instrument for Judging the Quality of Written Consumer Health Information on Treatment Choices. JECH. 53:105-111.

Ateşçi AA, Kılınç K (2022) Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Online Information on Treatments of Traumatic Dental Injuries. Selcuk Dent J. 9:46-52.

Kölpin M, Sterzenbach G, Naumann M (2014) Composite Filling or Single Crown? The Clinical Dilemma of How to Restore Endodontically Treated Teeth. Quintessence Int. 45:457-466.

Carvalho MA, Lazari PC, Gresnigt M, Del Bel Cury AA, Magne P (2018) Current Options Concerning the Endodontically-Treated Teeth Restoration with the Adhesive Approach. Braz Oral Res.18:74.

Hassan S, Masoud O (2021) Online Health Information Seeking and Health Literacy Among Non-Medical College Students: Gender Differences. J Public Health. 29:1267-1273.

Abu-Ghazaleh S, Hassona Y, Hattar S (2018) Dental Trauma in Social Media-Analysis of Facebook Content and Public Engagement. Dent Traumatol. 34:394-400.

Bhuva B, Giovarruscio M, Rahim N, Bitter K, Mannocci F (2021) The Restoration of Root Filled Teeth: A Review of the Clinical Literature. Int Endod J. 54:509-535.

Mannocci F, Bhuva B, Roig M, Zarow M, Bitter K (2021) European Society of Endodontology Position Statement: The Restoration of Root Filled Teeth. Int Endod J. 54:1974-1981.

Chatzopoulos GS, Wolff LF (2017) Implant and Endodontic Treatment Selection Are Influenced by Patients' Demographic Characteristics, Insurance Status, and Medical History: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Quintessence Int. 48:753-764.

Azarpazhooh A, Dao T, Ungar WJ, Chaudry F, Figueiredo R, Krahn M, Friedman S (2014) Clinical Decision Making for a Tooth with Apical Periodontitis: The Patients' Preferred Level of Participation. J Endod. 40:784-789.

Sorrell JT, McNeil DW, Gochenour LL, Jackson CR (2009) Evidence-Based Patient Education: Knowledge Transfer to Endodontic Patients. J Dent Educ. 73:1293-1305.

Korpela I, Vaununmaa K, Tolvanen M, Suominen A, Freeman R, Lahti S (2019) Dental Students' and Patients' Perceived Importance and Knowledge of Dental Anxiety. Eur J Dent Educ. 23:515-521.

Alpaydın M T, Buyuk S K, Canigur Bavbek N (2022) Information on The Internet About Clear Aligner Treatment-an Assessment Of Content, Quality, and Readability. J Orofac Orthop. 83:1-12.

Nangia D, Saini A, Krishnan A, Sharma S, Kumar V, Chawla A, Logani A (2022) Quality and Accuracy of Patient‐Oriented Web‐Based Information Regarding Tooth Avulsion. Den Traumatol. 38:299-308.

Alshehri A, Alghofaili N, ALshunaiber R, Alkadi L (2022) Quality and Readability Assessment of Internet-Based Information on Common Prosthodontic Treatments. Int J Prosthodont. 35:62-67.

Wiriyakijja P, Fedele S, Porter S, Ni Riordain R (2016) Web‐Based Information on the Treatment of Oral Leukoplakia–Quality and Readability. J Oral Pathol Med. 45:617-620.

Duymaz YK, Erkmen B, Şahin Ş, Tekin AM (2023) Evaluation of the Readability of Turkish Online Resources Related To Laryngeal Cancer. Eur J Ther. 29(2):168-17.




How to Cite

Erdinç, G., & Özdemir, O. (2023). Readability and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Information Concerning Post-Endodontic Treatment Selection. European Journal of Therapeutics, 29(3), 534–541.



Original Articles