Relationship Between Ostiomeatal Complex Variations and Maxillary Sinus Pathologies in Children and Adolescents Using CBCT


Abstract views: 236 / PDF downloads: 370

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther.20232902-1609.y

Keywords:

Ostiomeatal complex, anatomical variations, maxillary sinus pathologies, children and adolescents, cone-beam computed tomography

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate relationship between ostiomeatal complex variations (OMC) and maxillary sinus pathologies in children and adolescents using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods: CBCT images of 72 patients (44 males and 28 females) aged 7-18 years were evaluated retrospectively. Presence of nasal septal deviation (NSD), nasal septal pneumatization (NSP), concha bullosa (CB), accessory maxillary ostium (AMO), agger nasi cell (ANC), Haller cell (HC), Onodi cell (OC), ethmoid sinusitis and maxillary sinus pathologies were investigated. Maxillary sinus pathologies were classified. Correlations of OMC variations with each other, maxillary sinus pathologies and ethmoid sinusitis were investigated. Chi-square test was used to analyze relationships among variables and distribution of parameters.

Results: NSD was determined in 70.8%, NSP in 40.3%, ethmoid sinusitis in 75%, maxillary sinus pathology in 34.8% of images. OMC variations rates were detected as CB 31.3%, AMO 16%, ANC 16%, HC 24.3% and OC 18.8%. The most common maxillary sinus pathology was localized mucosal thickening, with a rate of 15.3% on right and 22.2% on left. Statistically significant differences were determined between almost all OMC variations with each other, and between anatomical variations in OMC with maxillary sinus pathologies except for NSP and AMO (p < 0.05). The presence of ethmoid sinusitis was more common in males (p =0.026).

Conclusion: Anatomical variations in OMC had no significant effect on maxillary sinus pathology except for NSP and AMO. Besides, most of anatomical variations in OMC were statistically significantly correlated with each other. CBCT visualization of these variations is important for sinonasal surgery and is an effective method in children and adolescents with low radiation dose and high image quality compared to computed tomography.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ritter L, Lutz J, Neugebauer J, Scheer M, Dreiseidler T, Zinser MJ (2011) Prevalence of pathologic findings in the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 111(5):634-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.12.007

Mamatha H, Shamasundar N, Bharathi M, Prasanna L (2010) Variations of ostiomeatal complex and its applied anatomy: a CT scan study. Indian J Sci Technol. 3(8):904-907.

Sivaslı E, Şirikçi A, Bayazıt Y, Gümüsburun E, Erbagci H, Bayram M (2002) Anatomic variations of the paranasal sinus area in pediatric patients with chronic sinusitis. Surg Radiol Anat. 24(6):399-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-002-0074-x

Medina J, Hernandez H, Tom LW, Bilaniuk L (1997) Development of the paranasal sinuses in children. Am J Rhinol. 11(3):203-210. https://doi.org/10.2500/105065897781751857

Kennedy DW, Zinreich SJ, Rosenbaum AE, Johns ME (1985) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: theory and diagnostic evaluation. Arch Otolaryngol. 111(9):576-582. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1985.00800110054002

Kretzschmar DP, Kretzschmar CJL (2003) Rhinosinusitis: review from a dental perspective. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 96(2):128-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00306-8

Beale TJ, Madani G, Morley SJ (2009) Imaging of the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity: normal anatomy and clinically relevant anatomical variants. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI; WB Saunders. 30(1):2-16. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2008.10.011

Al-Qudah M (2008) The relationship between anatomical variations of the sino-nasal region and chronic sinusitis extension in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 72(6):817-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.02.006

Tomomatsu N, Uzawa N, Aragaki T, Harada K (2014) Aperture width of the osteomeatal complex as a predictor of successful treatment of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 43(11):1386-1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.06.007

Kantarci M, Karasen RM, Alper F, Onbas O, Okur A, Karaman A (2004) Remarkable anatomic variations in paranasal sinus region and their clinical importance. Eur J Radiol. 50(3):296-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.08.012

Kumar H, Choudhry R, Kakar S (2001) Accessory maxillary ostia: topography and clinical application. J Anat Soc India. 50(1):3-5.

Sarna A, Hayman LA, Laine FJ, Taber KH (2002) Coronal imaging of the osteomeatal unit: anatomy of 24 variants. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 26(1):153-157.

Kang B-C, Yoon S-J, Lee J-S, Al-Rawi W, Palomo JM (2011) The use of cone beam computed tomography for the evaluation of pathology, developmental anomalies and traumatic injuries relevant to orthodontics. Seminars in Orthodontics; WB Saunders. 17:20-33. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2010.08.005

Katheria BC, Kau CH, Tate R, Chen J-W, English J, Bouquot J (2010) Effectiveness of impacted and supernumerary tooth diagnosis from traditional radiography versus cone beam computed tomography. Pediatr Dent. 32(4):304-309. PMID: 20836949

Korbmacher H, Kahl-Nieke B, Schöllchen M, Heiland M (2007) Value of two cone-beam computed tomography systems from an orthodontic point of view. J Orofac Orthop. 68(4):278-289. PMID: 17639276

Naitoh M, Suenaga Y, Kondo S, Gotoh K, Ariji E (2009) Assessment of maxillary sinus septa using cone‐beam computed tomography: etiological consideration. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 11:52-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00194.x

Jun Kim H, Jung Cho M, Lee J-W, Tae Kim Y, Kahng H, Sung Kim (2006) The relationship between anatomic variations of paranasal sinuses and chronic sinusitis in children. Acta Otolaryngol. 126(10):1067-1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480600606681

Cohen O, Adi M, Shapira-Galitz Y, Halperin D, Warman M (2019) Anatomic variations of the paranasal sinuses in the general pediatric population. Rhinology. 57(3):206-212. PMID: 30778427

Shokri A, Faradmal MJ, Hekmat B (2019) Correlations between anatomical variations of the nasal cavity and ethmoidal sinuses on cone-beam computed tomography scans. Imaging Sci Dent. 49(2):103. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.2.103

Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J (2012) European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps, A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology. 50(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.4193/rhino12.000

White SC, Pharoah MJ (2014) Oral radiology-E-Book: Principles and interpretation, Elsevier Health Sciences.

Pelinsari Lana J, Moura Rodrigues Carneiro P, de Carvalho Machado V (2012) Anatomic variations and lesions of the maxillary sinus detected in cone beam computed tomography for dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 23(12):1398-1403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02321.x

Rege ICC, Sousa TO, Leles CR (2012) Occurrence of maxillary sinus abnormalities detected by cone beam CT in asymptomatic patients. BMC Oral Health. 12:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-12-30

Dave M, Loughlin A, Walker E (2020) Challenges in plain film radiographic diagnosis for the dental team: a review of the maxillary sinus. Br Dent J. 228(8):587-594. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-1524-8

Aramani A, Karadi R, Kumar S (2014) A study of anatomical variations of osteomeatal complex in chronic rhinosinusitis patients-CT findings. J Clin Diagn Res. 8(10):KC01. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/9323.4923

Fadda G, Rosso S, Aversa S, Petrelli A, Ondolo C, Succo G (2012) Multiparametric statistical correlations between paranasal sinus anatomic variations and chronic rhinosinusitis. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 32(4):244. PMID: 23093814

Farman AG, Scarfe WC (2009) The basics of maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography. Seminars in Orthodontics, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2008.09.001

Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P (2006) Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 72(1):75-80.

Scarfe WC (2012) Radiation risk in low-dose maxillofacial radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 114(3):277-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.07.001

Affairs ADACoS (2012) The use of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: an advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 143(8):899-902. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0295

Theodorakou C, Walker A, Horner K, Pauwels R, Bogaerts R, Jacobs Dds R (2012) Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol. 85(1010):153-160. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/19389412

Šubarić M, Mladina R (2002) Nasal septum deformities in children and adolescents: a cross sectional study of children from Zagreb, Croatia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 63(1):41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5876(01)00646-2

Köse E, Canger, EM, Göller Bulut D (2018) Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of paranasal variations, osteomeatal complex disease, odontogenic lesion and their effect on maxillary sinus. Meandros Med Dent J. 19(4):310. https://doi.org/10.4274

Ali IK, Sansare K, Karjodkar FR, Vanga K, Salve P, Pawar AM (2017) Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of accessory maxillary ostium and Haller cells: Prevalence and clinical significance. Imaging Sci Dent. 47(1):33. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2017.47.1.33

Bani-Ata M, Aleshawi A, Khatatbeh A, Al-Domaidat D, Alnussair B, Al-Shawaqfeh R (2020) Accessory maxillary ostia: prevalence of an anatomical variant and association with chronic sinusitis. Int J Gen Med. 13:163. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S253569

Yenigun A, Fazliogullari Z, Gun C, Uysal II, Nayman A, Karabulut AK (2016) The effect of the presence of the accessory maxillary ostium on the maxillary sinus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 273:4315-4319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4129-8

Ghosh P, Kumarasekaran P, Sriraman G (2018) Incidence of accessory ostia in patients with chronic maxillary sinusitis. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 4(2):443-447.

Shpilberg KA, Daniel SC, Doshi AH, Lawson W, Som PM (2015) CT of anatomic variants of the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity: poor correlation with radiologically significant rhinosinusitis but importance in surgical planning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 204(6):1255-1260. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13762

Laine F, Smoker W (1992) The ostiomeatal unit and endoscopic surgery: anatomy, variations, and imaging findings in inflammatory diseases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 159(4):849-857. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.159.4.1529853

Stammberger H, Wolf G (1988) Headaches and sinus disease: the endoscopic approach. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 97(5):3-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894880970S501

Al-Qudah M, Mardini D (2015) Computed tomographic analysis of frontal recess cells in pediatric patients. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 29(6):425-429. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4243

Shokri A, Miresmaeili A, Farhadian N, Falah-Kooshki S, Amini P, Mollaie N (2017) Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 46(5):20160180. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160180

Bolger WE, Parsons DS, Butzin CA (1991) Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 101(1):56-64. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199101000-00010

Downloads

Published

2023-06-04

How to Cite

Yalcin, E. D., Aslan Ozturk, E. M., & Bozkaya, S. (2023). Relationship Between Ostiomeatal Complex Variations and Maxillary Sinus Pathologies in Children and Adolescents Using CBCT. European Journal of Therapeutics, 29(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther.20232902-1609.y

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Categories