The Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Electrophysiological Procedures: A Single-Center Tertiary Experience

Burak Sezenöz; Ahmet Hakan Ateş; Hikmet Yorgun; Kudret Aytemir

doi:10.54614/eurjther.2022.0049

Authors

Burak Sezenöz Department of Cardiology, Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine Ankara, Turkey - Department of Cardiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6386-7045
Ahmet Hakan Ateş Department of Cardiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5414-7268
Hikmet Yorgun Department of Cardiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey - Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7673-229X
Kudret Aytemir Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9279-8424

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54614/eurjther.2022.0049

Keywords:

Electrophysiology, COVID-19, arrhythmia, coronavirus

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the impact of novel coronavirus pandemic on the number and diversity of electrophysiology procedures in a tertiary referral electrophysiology unit in Turkey.

Methods: All consecutive electrophysiology procedures were retrospectively analyzed performed in our electrophysiology department between January 2017 and March 2021. The number of procedures and the distribution of cases per month were calculated preceding and during the pandemic. The diversity of the procedures was also evaluated. We compared the number of electrophysiology procedures between pre-coronavirus disease and post-coronavirus disease period.

Results: Overall, the electrophysiology procedures were decreased by 11.1% compared to previous years (P=.017). The most significant difference was observed in April (−89.8%), May (−66.1%), November (−21.7%), December (−29.4%) 2020, and the first month of 2021 (−38.8%). These intervals coincided with the peak coronavirus disease incidence in our country. Atrial fibrillation and supraventricular tachycardia ablation rates significantly dropped by 22.2% (P=.038 and P=.039; respectively) throughout the coronavirus disease outbreak; however, only mild non-significant change occurred in the number of ventricular tachycardia ablations.

Conclusion: The coronavirus pandemic has significantly affected the number of electrophysiological studies in our center. It is apparent that this pandemic will be affecting our practice for a while. We need to develop contemporary measures to improve healthcare for non- coronavirus disease patients.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/whodirector-general-s-openingremarks-at-themediabriefing-on-covid-19—11-March-2020. Accessed March 12, 2020.

Declaration of Turkish Ministor of health. Available at: https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/TR-66935/genel-koronavirus-tablosu.html.

Kochi AN, Tagliari AP, Forleo GB, Fassini GM, Tondo C. Cardiac and arrhythmic complications in patients with COVID-19. J Cardiovac Electrophysiol. 2020;31(5):1003-1008.

Inciardi RM, Lupi L, Zaccone G, et al. Cardiac involvement in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):819-824

Kumar S, Haqqani H, Wynn G, et al. Position statement on the management of cardiac electrophysiology and cardiac implantable electronic devices in Australia During the COVID-19 pandemic: a living document. Heart Lung Circ. 2020;29(6):e57-e68.

Saenz LC, Miranda A, Speranza R, et al. Recommendations for the organization of electrophysiology and cardiac pacing services during the COVID-19 pandemic : Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) in collaboration with: Colombian College Of Electrophysiology, Argentinian Society of Cardiac Electrophysiology (SADEC), Brazilian Society Of Cardiac Arrhythmias (SOBRAC), Mexican Society Of Cardiac Electrophysiology (SOMEEC). J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020;59(2):307-313.

Lakkireddy DR, Chung MK, Gopinathannair R, et al. Guidance for cardiac electrophysiology during the COVID-19 pandemic from the Heart Rhythm Society COVID-19 Task Force; Electrophysiology Section of the American College of Cardiology; and the Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(9):e233-e241.

Li J, Mazzone P, Leung LWM, et al. Electrophysiology in the time of coronavirus: coping with the great wave. Europace. 2020;22(12):1841-1847.

Compagnucci P, Volpato G, Pascucci R, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a tertiary-level Electrophysiology Laboratory in Italy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13(9):e008774.

Boriani G, Palmisano P, Guerra F, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical activities related to arrhythmias and electrophysiology in Italy: results of a survey promoted by AIAC (Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing). Intern Emerg Med. 2020;15(8):1445-1456.

Pothineni NVK, Santangeli P, Deo R, Marchlinski FE, Hyman MC. COVID-19 and electrophysiology procedures-review, reset, reboot!!! J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020;59(2):303-305.

Wranicz JK, Drożdż J, Różycka-Kosmalska M, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the implementation of selected cardiac electrotherapy and electrophysiology procedures. Kardiol Pol. 2021;79(4):452-454.

Coromilas EJ, Kochav S, Goldenthal I, et al. Worldwide survey of COVID-19-Associated arrhythmias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021;14(3):e009458.

Siripanthong B, Nazarian S, Muser D, et al. Recognizing COVID19-related myocarditis: The possible pathophysiology and proposed guideline for diagnosis and management. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(9):1463-1471.

Puntmann VO, Carerj ML, Wieters I, et al. Outcomes of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients recently recovered from coronavirus d1isease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(11):1265-1273.