Comparison of shear bond strength of different universal adhesive systems  using the modes etch and rinse and self etch: [Üç farklı üniversal adeziv sistemin pürüzlendirip yıkamalı  ve kendinden pürüzlendirmeli kullanımının makaslama  bağlanma dayanımlarının karşılaştırılması]

Mehmet Ata CEBE; Hasan BIÇAKCI; Ömer ZENCİRLİ; Fatma CEBE

doi:10.5152/EurJTher.2016.03038

Authors

Mehmet Ata CEBE Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Bolu
Hasan BIÇAKCI Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Bolu
Ömer ZENCİRLİ Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Bolu
Fatma CEBE Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Bolu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5152/EurJTher.2016.03038

Keywords:

Universal adhesives, caries affected dentin, self etch, etch and rinse

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the shear bond strengths of three different universal adhesive systems to caries-affected dentin using the self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes.
Methods: Overall, 120 extracted human molars with occlusal caries were used in this study. Caries were removed until reach caries-affected dentin. Teeth were randomly divided into 6 groups and embedded in acrylic molds. Groups comprised Single Bond Universal (SBU; 3M-ESPE, St. Paul, USA) self etch, All Bond Universal (ABU; Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, USA) self etch, Clearfil Universal Bond (CUB; Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Okayama, Japan) self etch, SBU total etch (SBU-t), ABU total etch (ABU-t), and CUB total etch (CUB-t). After that samples were restorated with nanofil composite resin (Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative, 3M-ESPE, St. Paul, USA) and shear bond strength tests were performed. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and independent t-test (α=0.05).
Results: No significant differences in the bond strength values of different universal adhesives obtained using both total-etch and selfetch modeswere observed (p>0.05). When comparing the different uses of the same adhesive, a significant difference was observed only in the CUB group (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Lower values were obtained when using the etch-and-rinse mode.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 90-101.

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-35.

Kanca, J. 3rd. Resin bonding to wet substrate. 1. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 39-41

De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 118-32.

Reis A, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Gones OM, Patzlaff R, Loguercio AD. Impact of adhesive application to wet and dry dentin on long-term resin-dentin bond strengths. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 380-7.

Dal-Bianco K, Pellizzaro A, Patzlaft R, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effects of moisture degree and rubbing action on the immediate resin-dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 1150-6.

Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Wurst M, Duschner H, Dörfer C. The nanoleakage phenomenon: influence of moist vs dry bonding. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4: 23-30.

Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 1385-91.

Sano H, Kanemura N, Burrow MF, Inai N, Yamada T, Tagami J. Effect of operator variability on dentin adhesion: students vs. dentists. Dent Mater 1998; 17: 51-8.

Kanca J 3rd. Wet bonding: effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 273-6.

Hashimoto M, Tay FR, Svizero NR, de Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ, Sano H, et al. The effects of common errors on sealing ability of total-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 560-8.

Foong J, Lee K, Nguyen C, Tang G, Austin D, Ch’ng C, et al. Comparison of microshear bond strengths of four self-etching bonding systems to enamel using two test methods. Aust Dent J 2006; 51: 252-7.

Boillagguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin CH, et al. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one step, and self-etching adhesive systems. Journal of Dentistry 2001; 29: 55-61.

Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 17-28.

Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y, Akamine A. Self-etching adhesives and postoperative sensitivity. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 191-5.

Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS, Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1621-9.

Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 1176-84.

Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012; 40: 475-84.

Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2012; 25: 153-8.

Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014; 42: 800-7.

Mena-Serrano A, Kose C, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Logercio AD, et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation. J Esthet Rest Dent 2013; 25: 55-69.

Murdoch-Kinch CA, McLean ME. Minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 87-95.

Fusayama T. Two layers of carious dentin; diagnosis and treatment. Oper Dent 1979; 4: 63-70.

Wang Y, Spencer P, Walker MP. Chemical profile of adhesive/cariesaffected dentin interfaces using Raman microspectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007; 81: 279-86.

Roberson TM. Cariology: The lesion, Etiology, Prevention, and control. In: Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, eds. Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. Fifth ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby elsevier 2006: 65-134.

Hamid A, Hume WR. Diffusion of resin monomers through human carious dentin in vitro. Endod Dent Traumatol 1997; 13: 1-5.

de Goes MF, Shinohara MS, Freitas MS. Performance of a new onestep multi mode adhesive on etched vs non-etched enamel on bond strength andinterfacial morphology. J Adhes Dent 2014; 16: 243-50.

Yonemoto K, Eguro T, Maeda T, Tanaka H. Application of DIAGNOdent as a guide for removing carious dentin with Er: YAG laser. J Dent 2006; 34: 269-76.

Woronko GA Jr, St Germain HA Jr, Meiers JC. Effect of dentin primer on the shear bond strength between composite resin and enamel. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 116-21.

Moll K, Fritzenschaft A, Haller B. In vitro comparison of dentin bonding systems: effect of testing method and operator. Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 845-52.

Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 95-110.

McComb D. Caries-detector dyes-how accurate and useful are they? J Can Dent Assoc 2000; 66: 195-8.

Saikaew P, Chowdhury AF, Fukuyama M, Kakuda S, Carvalho RM, Sano H. The effect of dentine surface preparation and reduced application time of adhesive on bonding strength. J Dent 2016; 47: 63-70.

Loguercio AD, Barroso LP, Grande RH, Reis A. Comparison of intraand intertooth resin–dentin bond strength variability. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2005; 7: 151-8.

Perdigão J, Loguercio AD. Universal or multi-modeadhesives: why and how? J Adhes Dent 2014; 16: 193-4.

Karaman E, Tuncer D, Yazıcı AR, Karahan S, Ertan A. Farklı adeziv sistemlerin dentine makaslama bağlanma dayanımı: in vitro çalışma. Acta Odontol Turc 2015; 32: 112-5.

Barutcigil Ç, Kürklü D, Barutcigil K, Arslan H. Farklı yüzey işlemleri uygulanmış dentine üniversal bağlayıcı ajanın bağlanma dayanımının incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2013; 21: 324-330.

Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1459-67.

Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, et al. Selfassembled Nano-layering at the Adhesive Interface. J Dent Res 2012; 91: 376-81.

Titley KC, Chernecky R, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV. The effect of various storage methods and media on shear-bond strengths of dental composite resin to bovine dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1998; 43: 305-11.

Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Hartley PG, Tyas MJ. The influence of the modification of etched bovine dentin on bond strengths. Dent Mater 2000; 16:255-65.

Jacobsen T, Soderholm KJ, Garcea I, Mondragon E. Calcium leaching from dentin and shear bond strength after etching with phosphoric acid of different concentrations. Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 108: 247-54.

Nam KY, Kim JB, Jang BC, Kwon TY, Kim KH. Effects of dentin bonding agents on bonding durability of a flowable composite to dentin. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 224-31.