Effect of Sugammadex on Coagulation Parameters in Cesarean Section Patients a Prospective Controlled Observational Study
Abstract views: 116
/ 
PDF downloads: 98
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjther.2021.21003Keywords:
Cesarean section, coagulation, sugammadex, aPTT, neostigmin, postpartum bleedingAbstract
Objective: To evaluate, for the first time in the literature, the effect of sugammadex in elective C/S patients in terms of hemostatic parameters and postoperative bleeding. Methods: Seventy-six patients enrolled for this observational prospective controlled study. Patients were divided into two groups according to anesthetic reversal agent: sugammadex (group I) vs neostigmin (group II). Intraoperative and postoperative amount of bleeding were recorded. At the end of the surgery, after administration of reversal agent, and at postoperative 30th minute, 1st, and 2nd hours, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), prothrombin time (PT), and international normalized ratio (INR) values were recorded. Postoperative Hct, Hgb, and Plt values at 6th and 24th hours of reversal agent administration were also recorded. Results: Alterations in aPTT, PT, and INR values were similar between the groups (P ¼ .986, .549, .05, respectively). Conclusion: Sugammadex at 2 mg kg1 in cesarean section patients has a similar effect on coagulation parameters compared to neostigmin. Further studies are needed particularly in patients under thromboprophylaxis.
Metrics
References
Hellgren M. Hemostasis during normal pregnancy and puerperium. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2003;29:125-130.
Brenner B. Haemostatic changes in pregnancy. Thromb Res. 2004;114:409-414.
O’Riordan MN, Higgins JR. Haemostasis in normal and abnormal pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;17:385-396.
Franchini M. Haemostasis and pregnancy. Thromb Haemost. 2006;95:401-413.
Stirling Y, Woolf L, North WR, Seghatchian MJ, Meade TW. Haemostasis in normal pregnancy. Thromb Haemost. 1984;52:176-182.
Bonnar J. Haemostasis and coagulation disorders in pregnancy. In Bloom AL, Thomas DP (eds.): Haemostasis and Thrombosis. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1987: 570-584.
Letsky EA. Coagulation Problems during Pregnancy. Vol. 10. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1985. 8. Greer IA. Haemostasis and thrombosis in pregnancy. In Bloom AL, Forbes CD, Thomas DP, Tuddenham EGD (eds.): Haemostasis and Thrombosis, 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1994: 987-1015.
Kinsella SM, Winton AL, Mushambi MC, et al. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015;24:356-374.
Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F, Marty J. Residual paralysis after emergence from anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:1013-1022.
Naguib M. Sugammadex: Another milestone in clinical neuromuscular pharmacology. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:575-581.
Gijsenbergh F, Ramael S, Houwing N, van Iersel T. First human exposure of Org 25969, a novel agent to reverse the action of
rocuronium bromide. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:695-703.
Adam JM, Bennett DJ, Bom A, et al. Cyclodextrin-derived host molecules as reversal agents for the neuromuscular blocker rocuronium bromide: Synthesis and structure-activity relationships. J Med Chem. 2002;45:1806-1816.
Gaszynski T, Szewczyk T, Gaszynski W. Randomized comparison of sugammadex and neostigmine for reversal of rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation in morbidly obese undergoing general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:236-239.
Stouracˇ P, Kosinova´ M, Ba´ rtı´kova´ I, et al. Sugammadex for active reversal of neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium for
cesarean delivery in general anesthesia series of case reports [in Czech]. Anest Intenziv Med. 2013;24:163-168.
Pu¨Hringer FK, Kristen P, Rex C. Sugammadex reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block in caesarean section
patients: A series of seven cases. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:657-660.
Williamson RM, Mallaiah S, Barclay P. Rocuronium and sugammadex for rapid sequence induction of obstetric general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:694-699.
Shibusawa M, Ejima Y, Nishino R, Toyama H, Kurosawa S. Use of sugammadex in patients undergoing caesarean section using general anesthesia with rocuronium. Masui. 2012;61:805-809.
Nauheimer D, Kollath C, Geldner G. Modified rapid sequence induction for Caesarian sections: Case series on the use of rocuronium and sugammadex. Anaesthesist. 2012;61:691-695.
Rahe-Meyer N, Fennema H, Schulman S, et al. Effect of reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex versus usual care on
bleeding risk in a randomized study of surgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2014;121(5):969-977.
De Kam PJ, El Galta R, Kruithof AC, et al. No clinically relevant interaction between sugammadex and aspirin on platelet aggregation
and coagulation parameters. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;51:976-985.
De Kam PJ, Grobara P, Prohn M, et al. Effects of sugammadex on activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time in
healthy subjects. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;52:227-236.
European Medicines Agency. Assessment report for bridion. Document Reference EMEA/CHMP/317523/2008. 2008.
Tas N, Korkmaz H, Yag˘ an O¨ , Korkmaz M. Effect of sugammadex on postoperative bleeding and coagulation parameters after septoplasty: A randomized prospective study. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:2382-2386.
Raft J, Guerci P, Harter V, Fuchs-Buder T, Meistelman C. Biological evaluation of the effect of sugammadex on hemostasis and bleeding. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015;68(1):17.
Summary of product characteristics. Bridion. 2014. Available at http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_
Product_Information/human/000885/WC500052310.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
