Surgical Management of Pain and Paresthesia Associated with the Superficialization Phenomenon of the Inferior Alveolar and Mental Nerve in Severely Atrophic Mandibles: A Case Series

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther2804

Keywords:

Inferior alveolar nerve, mandibular atrophy, paresthesia, nerve superficialization

Abstract

Dear Editor,

Mandibular atrophy secondary to aging and prolonged edentulism can lead to superficialization of the inferior alveolar and mental nerves[1]. This condition may result in chronic pain, paresthesia and hyperesthesia, significantly reducing patients’ quality of life and complicating prosthetic rehabilitation. In such cases, removable dentures often fail due to loss of retention, mucosal overload and nerve compression, which in turn lead to both functional and psychological problems [2].

Superficialization of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is usually reported by patients as complaints of pain, paresthesia, or hyperesthesia. Radiographically, IAN superficialization was defined on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging as an alveolar crest-to-mandibular canal distance of ≤2 mm and/or a cortical bone thickness overlying the canal of <1 mm, or complete loss of the cortical plate. These radiological findings were evaluated together with the patients’ clinical complaints of pain and paresthesia, both of which may severely compromise quality of life. In atrophic mandibles, nerve superficialization carries the risk of iatrogenic nerve injury, particularly during placement of prostheses or implants, as these may exert pressure on the nerve. Autogenous block bone grafting, which has been reported with high success rates, represents a promising method for both relieving pain and paresthesia and creating adequate bone volume for rehabilitation [3].

In this letter, the authors present their clinical experience with autogenous bone grafting in patients suffering from pain and paresthesia due to nerve superficialization in severely atrophic mandibles, and emphasize its potential as a low-risk and effective treatment option.

 

References

Peixoto HE, Camati PR, Faot F, Sotto-Maior BS, Martinez EF, Peruzzo DC (2017) Rehabilitation of the atrophic mandible with short implants in different positions: A finite elements study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 80:122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.310

Whitmyer C, Esposito SJ, Alperin S (2003) Longitudinal treatment of a severely atrophic mandible: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 90(2):116–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00265-8

Nkenke E, Neukam FW (2014) Autogenous bone harvesting and grafting in advanced jaw resorption: morbidity, resorption and implant survival. Eur J Oral Implantol. 7(Suppl 2):S203-217.

Barbu HM, Levin L, Bucur MB, Comaneanu RM, Lorean A (2014) A modified surgical technique for inferior alveolar nerve repositioning on severely atrophic mandibles: case series of 11 consecutive surgical procedures. Chirurgia (Bucur). 109(1):111–116.

Abayev B, Juodzbalys G (2015) Inferior alveolar nerve lateralization and transposition for dental implant placement. Part I: a systematic review of surgical techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 6(1):e2. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2015.6102

Günpınar Ş, Şengün MC, Sevinç AS (2021) İnferior Alveolar Sinir Transpozisyonu ile Eş zamanlı Dental İmplant Yerleştirilmesi: 4 Yıl Takipli Bir Vaka Raporu. Selcuk Dental Journal. 8(3):832–838. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.729169

Patzelt SBM, Bahat O, Reynolds MA, Strub JR (2014) The All‐on‐Four Treatment Concept: A Systematic Review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 16(6):836–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12068

Sbordone C, Toti P, Guidetti F, Califano L, Pannone G, Sbordone L (2014) Volumetric changes after sinus augmentation using blocks of autogenous iliac bone or freeze-dried allogeneic bone. A non-randomized study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 42(2):113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.03.004

Zizelmann C, Schoen R, Metzger MC, Schmelzeisen R, Schramm A, et al. (2007) Bone formation after sinus augmentation with engineered bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 18(1):69–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01295.x

Buser D, Brägger U, Lang NP, Nyman S (1990) Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1(1):22–32. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010104.x

McKenna GJ, Gjengedal H, Harkin J, Holland N, Moore C, Srinivasan M (2022) Effect of Autogenous Bone Graft Site on Dental Implant Survival and Donor Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 22(3):101731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101731

Figure 7. The patients’ postoperative radiographic evaluation of the dental implants

Downloads

Published

2025-10-21

How to Cite

Çiftçi, S., & Yardımcı, E. (2025). Surgical Management of Pain and Paresthesia Associated with the Superficialization Phenomenon of the Inferior Alveolar and Mental Nerve in Severely Atrophic Mandibles: A Case Series. European Journal of Therapeutics, 31(6), 477–484. https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther2804

Issue

Section

Letter to the Editor

Categories