Rooted or Replaced? Comparative Insights into Tooth- and Implant-Supported Overdentures with Case Series
Abstract views: 148
/ 
PDF downloads: 172
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther2746Keywords:
attachment systems, edentulism, implant-supported overdenture, overdentures, prosthodontics, tooth-supported overdentureAbstract
Objective: This review aims to provide a comparative analysis of tooth-supported and implant-supported overdentures, focusing on clinical, biomechanical, functional, and patient-centred outcomes. In addition to summarizing current literature, the review integrates illustrative clinical case series to contextualize decision-making in prosthodontic practice.
Methods: A comprehensive review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted, examining outcomes associated with both overdenture modalities. Clinical cases were selected to represent common scenarios encountered in prosthodontics and to demonstrate the practical application of treatment principles. These cases were evaluated alongside published evidence to highlight indications, techniques, and patient-centered considerations.
Results: Implant-supported overdentures (ISODs) consistently demonstrated superior retention, masticatory efficiency, and patient satisfaction, particularly in cases of advanced ridge resorption. Tooth-supported overdentures (TSODs), on the other hand, preserved proprioception, maintained alveolar bone via retained roots, and served as a cost-effective, minimally invasive alternative. The included case series highlighted real-world scenarios where each modality was selected based on anatomical, systemic, and psychological factors. Attachment systems—ball, locator, bar, and magnets—were also discussed for their role in prosthetic function and maintenance.
Conclusion: The integrated case series supports the conclusion that both TSODs and ISODs play vital roles in edentulous rehabilitation. While ISODs provide enhanced functional outcomes, TSODs remain valuable for medically compromised patients or those seeking non-surgical solutions. Treatment success hinges on individualized case selection, informed consent, and long-term maintenance protocols. This review emphasizes the necessity of a patient-specific, evidence-informed approach to overdenture therapy in modern prosthodontics.
References
Emami E, de Souza RF, Kabawat M, Feine JS (2013) The impact of edentulism on oral and general health. Int J Dent. 2013:498305. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/498305
Layton DM, Morgano SM, Muller F, et al (2023) Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms 2023, 10th edition. J Prosthet Dent. 130(4S1):e1-e126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.03.003
Martí-Vigil J, Casamitjana J, Marimon X, Cerrolaza M, Medina-Gálvez R, et al. (2024) Impact testing in implant-supported prostheses and natural teeth: A systematic review of properties and performance. Materials (Basel). 17(16):4040. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17164040
Goswami M, Kumar MVS, Kumar R, Saxena R, Kumar K (2024) A case report on tooth-supported overdentures: Restoring function and aesthetics. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 10(4):230-234. https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2024.v10.i4d.2067
Sharka R, Abed H, Hector M. (2019) Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction of edentulous patients using conventional complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures: An umbrella systematic review. Gerodontology. 36(4):315-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12399
Elawady D, Adam MA, Allam H, et al (2024) Single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a literature review. Cureus. 16(1):e52486. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.52486
Aunmeungtong W, Kumchai T, Strietzel FP, Reichart PA, Khongkhunthian P. (2017) Comparative clinical study of conventional dental implants and mini dental implants for mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 19(2):328-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12461
Park JH, Lee JY, Shin SW. (2017) Treatment outcomes for mandibular mini-implant-retained overdentures: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 30(3):269-276. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4929
Potdukhe S, Iyer J, Uikey M, Nadgere J (2022) Attachment retained tooth supported overdentures: a case series. J Clin Diagn Res. 16(4):ZR01-ZR04. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52599.16235
Drashti G, Rajesh S (2019) Tooth supported overdenture: Imperative treatment modality: Root to basics. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 5(4):16–21.
Carlsson GE, Omar R (2010) The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation: a critical review. J Oral Rehabil. 37(2):143-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02039.x
Leong JZ, Beh YH, Ho TK (2024) Tooth-supported overdentures revisited. Cureus 16(1):e53184. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.53184
La Monaca G, Pranno N, Annibali S, Massimo C, Polimeni A, et al. (2021) Survival and complication rates of tooth-implant versus freestanding implant supporting fixed partial prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 65(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2019_494
Ramakrishnan H, Ragupathi M (2022) Mandibular implant overdenture - treatment modalities and maintenance - an integrative overview. J Dent Implant Res. 41(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.54527/jdir.2022.41.1.1
Ozan O, Ramoglu S. (2015) Effect of implant height differences on different attachment types and peri-implant bone in mandibular two-implant overdentures: a 3D finite element study. J Oral Implantol. 41(3):e50-e59. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00239
Doundoulakis JH, Eckert SE, Lindquist CC, Jeffcoat MK (2003) The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture. J Am Dent Assoc. 134(11):1455-1458. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0073
Kumar A, Rai P, Kopparapu VGCK, Sunkala L (2022) Evaluation of the mean bite force and masticatory performance of maxillary and mandibular complete dentures vs mandibular implant-supported overdenture. J Contemp Dent Pract. 23(5):513-519.
Zulkadir Ergin N, Öğüt S, Ergin MO (2024) Case series on implant supported overdenture prosthesis. HRU Int J Dent Oral Res. 4(1):19-23. https://doi.org/10.61139/ijdor.1436638
Klotz AL, Fobbe H, Rammelsberg P, Bermejo JL, Kappel S (2021) Survival and success of tooth–implant-supported and solely implant-supported double-crown-retained overdentures: a prospective study over up to 11 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 32(12):1425-1432. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13842
Prasad DK, Prasad DA, Buch M (2014) Selection of attachment systems in fabricating an implant supported overdenture. J Dent Implants. 4(2):176-181. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-6781.140905
Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, Swain MV (2009) Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: A review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features. Int J Prosthodont. 22:429-440.
Elabdouli R, El Assraoui K, Rimaoui S, Bellemkhannate S (2024) Mandibular tooth supported overdenture: case report. Open Access Libr J. 11:e11068. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111068
Sutariya PV, Shah HM, Patel SD, et al (2021) Mandibular implant-supported overdenture: a systematic review and meta-analysis for optimum selection of attachment system. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 21(4):319-327. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_158_21
Mahajan N, Thakkur RK (2013) Overdenture locator attachments for atrophic mandible. Contemp Clin Dent. 4(4):509-511. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.123060
Alam MK, Elbeshbeishy R, Abutayyem HM, Sghaireen MG (2024) Assessment of patient satisfaction and functional outcomes in orthognathic surgery. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 16(Suppl 1):S561-S563. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_864_23
Alvarez-Arenal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, Dellanos-Lanchares H, Martin-Fernandez E, Brizuela-Velasco A, Ellacuria-Echebarria J. (2017) Effect of implant- and occlusal load location on stress distribution in Locator attachments of mandibular overdentures: a finite element study. J Adv Prosthodont. 9(5):371-380. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.371
Nandhini N, Chandrashekaraiah P, Benzigar R, Shivananjan R, Arockiam AS (2025) Do implant overdentures improve chewing ability and quality of life despite no effect on nutritional status? Evid Based Dent. 26(1):19-20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-025-01107-w
Nassar HI (2016) Patient satisfaction of tooth supported overdentures utilizing ball attachments. Future Dent J .2(2):88-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2016.10.003
Hinz S, Bömicke W, Bensel T (2023) Cumulative 10-year performance of endodontically treated teeth with prosthetic restorations of base metal alloy double crowns with friction pins: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 27(8):4411- 4423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05060-9
Shaw MJ (1984) Attachment retained overdentures: a report on their maintenance requirements. J Oral Rehabil. 11(4):373-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1984.tb00588.x
Burns DR (2004) The mandibular complete overdenture. Dent Clin North Am. 48(3):603-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2004.03.002
Almeida EO, Gennari Filho H, Goiatto MC (2011) The use of transitional implants to support provisional prostheses during the healing phase: a literature review. Quintessence Int. 42(1):19-24.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vaishali Gupta, Bhupender Yadav, Sumit Singh Phukela, Jaiveer Yadav
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
